Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35383858›Full record

ArticleActa orthopaedica2022

Rapid rise in prevalence of knee replacements and decrease in revision burden over past 3 decades in Finland: a register-based analysis.

Konsta J Pamilo, Jaason Haapakoski, Tuulikki Sokka-Isler, Ville Remes, Juha Paloneva

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta orthopaedica, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Arthroplasty and Tennis: A Narrative Review.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2025
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Konsta J PamiloCoxa Hospital for Joint Replacement, Tampere. konsta.pamilo@coxa.fi.
Jaason HaapakoskiNational Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki. jaason.haapakoski@thl.fi.
Tuulikki Sokka-IslerHospital Nova of Central Finland, Central Finland Health Care District, Jyväskylä; University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio; 5 SYNLAB Suomi, Helsinki. tuulikki.sokka-isler@ksshp.fi.
Ville RemesSYNLAB Suomi, Helsinki; Jokilaakso Hospital, Jämsä, Finland. ville.remes@icloud.com.
Juha PalonevaHospital Nova of Central Finland, Central Finland Health Care District, Jyväskylä; University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio; 5 SYNLAB Suomi, Helsinki. juha.paloneva@ksshp.fi.
Synlab Czech (Czechia) · CZCoxa Hospital · FIFinnish Institute for Health and Welfare · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeThe prevalence of knee joint replacements (KJR) has been less investigated in situations where the increase in incidence is known. This study investigated the annual and population-based prevalence of KJR and the relationship between the prevalence of KJRs and the incidence of revision surgery. PATIENTS AND

methodsAll KJRs performed between 1980 and 2020 were identified from the Finnish Arthroplasty Register (FAR). KJR revisions and removals were extracted from the FAR and hospital discharge registers and patient deaths from Finnish Digital and Population Data Services Agency. We analyzed the annual prevalence by dividing the number of KJR survivors by the population aged 40 or older. The revision burden factor (RBF) was determined by dividing the annual number of revisions by the number of primary and revision KJRs in the population. Proportions of bilateral implants and patients with older KJRs performed 10 or more years earlier were identified.

resultsKJR prevalence in Finland increased by 298% between 2000 and 2020, reaching 4.0% in 2020. The proportion of patients with bilateral KJRs and those with older KJRs had increased to 37% and 34%, respectively, by 2020. The annual RBF decreased statistically significantly from 1.9% to 0.7% between 1996 and 2020 (proportion ratio, PR 0.37 [95% CI 0.33-0.42]) and was higher among males (PR 1.23 [CI 1.20-1.26]).

interpretationAlthough the recent rapid increase in KJRs is abating and the RBF is diminishing, it is important to take the continuing increase in the prevalence of KJRs into account when assessing hospitals' future resources.

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, Replacement, KneeKnee ProsthesisAdultFinlandHumansMalePrevalenceProsthesis FailureRegistriesReoperation

Identifiers

PMID35383858
PMCPMC8985425
OpenAlexW4224219168

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.