Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35383857›Full record

ArticleActa orthopaedica2022

Do changes in outcomes following primary and revision hip replacement differ and relate to markers of socioeconomic status? A 1-year population-based cohort study.

Martin B Stisen, André N Klenø, Julie S Jacobsen, Matthew D L O'Connell, Salma Ayis, Catherine Sackley, Alma B Pedersen, Inger Mechlenburg

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta orthopaedica, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Martin B StisenDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus N, Denmark; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus N, Denmark. mstisen@clin.au.dk.
André N KlenøDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus N, Denmark; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus N, Denmark . ank@clin.au.dk.
Julie S JacobsenResearch Centre for Health and Welfare Technology, Programme for Rehabilitation, VIA University College, Aarhus, Denmark; Research Unit for General Practice in Aarhus, Aarhus, Denmark. jsaj@via.dk.
Matthew D L O'ConnellDepartment of Population Health Sciences, School of Population Health and Environmental Sciences, Kings College London, London, UK. matthew.o'connell@kcl.ac.uk.
Salma AyisDepartment of Population Health Sciences, School of Population Health and Environmental Sciences, Kings College London, London, UK. salma.ayis@kcl.ac.uk.
Catherine SackleyDepartment of Population Health Sciences, School of Population Health and Environmental Sciences, Kings College London, London, UK. catherine.sackley@nottingham.ac.uk.
Alma B PedersenDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus N, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark . abp@clin.au.dk.
Inger MechlenburgDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus N, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark. inger.mechlenburg@clin.au.dk.
Aarhus University · DKAarhus University Hospital · DKDepartment of Health and Social Care · GBKing's College London · GBVIA University College · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeThere is little evidence on improvement after revision total hip replacement (THR). Moreover, improvements may be associated with socioeconomic status (SES). We investigated whether changes in Harris Hip Score (HHS) differ among patients undergoing primary and revision THR, and their association with markers of SES. PATIENTS AND

methodsWe conducted a populationbased cohort study on 16,932 patients undergoing primary and/or revision THR from 1995 to 2018 due to hip osteoarthritis. The patients were identified in the Danish Hip Arthroplasty Registry. Outcome was defined as mean change in HHS (0-100) from baseline to 1-year follow-up, and its association with SES markers (education, cohabiting, and wealth) was analyzed using multiple linear regression adjusting for sex, age, comorbidities, and baseline HHS.

resultsAt 1-year follow-up, HHS improved clinically relevant for patients undergoing both primary THR: mean 43 (95% CI 43-43) and revision THR: mean 31 (CI 29-33); however, the increase was 12 points (CI 10-14) higher for primary THR. For primary THR, improvements were 0.9 points (CI 0.4-1.5) higher for patients with high educational level compared with low educational level, 0.4 points (CI 0.0-0.8) higher for patients cohabiting compared with living alone, and 2.6 points higher (CI 2.1-3.0) for patients with high wealth compared with low wealth.

interpretationPatients undergoing primary THR achieve higher improvements on HHS than patients undergoing revision THR, and the improvements are negatively related to markers of low SES. Health professionals should be aware of these characteristics and be able to identify patients who may benefit from extra rehabilitation to improve outcomes after THR to ensure equality in health.

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, Replacement, HipOsteoarthritis, HipCohort StudiesHumansReoperationSocial ClassTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID35383857
PMCPMC8985216
OpenAlexW4224216237

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.