Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35383381›Full record

ReviewClinical anatomy (New York, N.Y.)2022

The lymphatic system throughout history: From hieroglyphic translations to state of the art radiological techniques.

Caroline J van Schaik, Lucas L Boer, Jos M T Draaisma, Carine J M van der Vleuten, Jan Jaap Janssen, Jurgen J Fütterer, Leo J Schultze Kool, Willemijn M Klein

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical anatomy (New York, N.Y.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Ocular Lymphatics in Health and Disease.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Comment on "Extended Versus Standard Complete Mesocolon Excision in Sigmoid Cancer. A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial".Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Caroline J van SchaikDepartment of Medical Imaging, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2540-5181
Lucas L BoerDepartment of Medical Imaging, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1564-0847
Jos M T DraaismaDepartment of General Pediatrics, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Carine J M van der VleutenDepartment of Dermatology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Jan Jaap JanssenDepartment of Medical Imaging, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Jurgen J FüttererDepartment of Medical Imaging, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Leo J Schultze KoolDepartment of Medical Imaging, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Willemijn M KleinDepartment of Medical Imaging, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Radboud University Nijmegen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A comprehensive lymphatic system is indispensable for a well-functioning body; it is integral to the immune system and is also interrelated with the digestive system and fluid homeostasis. The main difficulty in examining the lymphatic system is its fine-meshed structure. This remains a challenge, leaving patients with uninterpreted symptoms and a dearth of potential therapies. We review the history of the lymphatic system up to the present with the aim of improving current knowledge. Several findings described throughout history have made fundamental contributions to elucidating the lymphatic system. The first contributions were made by the ancient Egyptians and the ancient Greeks. Vesalius obtained new insights by dissecting corpses. Thereafter, Ruysch (1638-1731) gained an understanding of lymphatic flow. In 1784, Mascagni published his illustration of the whole lymphatic network. The introduction of radiological lymphography revolutionized knowledge of the lymphatic system. Pedal lymphangiography was first described by Monteiro (1931) and Kinmonth (1952). Lymphoscintigraphy (nuclear medicine), magnetic resonance imaging, and near-infrared fluorescence lymphography further improved visualization of the lymphatic system. The innovative dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance lymphangiography (DCMRL) transformed understanding of the central lymphatic system, enabling central lymphatic flow disorders in patients to be diagnosed and even allowing for therapeutic planning. From the perspective of the history of lymph visualization, DCMRL has ample potential for identifying specific causes of debilitating symptoms in patients with central lymphatic system abnormalities and even allows for therapeutic planning.

Indexed as

Lymphatic DiseasesLymphatic VesselsContrast MediaHumansLymphatic SystemLymphographyMagnetic Resonance ImagingContrast Mediadynamic MR lymphangiographylymphatic systemlymphographytherapeutic embolization

Identifiers

PMID35383381
PMCPMC9542037
OpenAlexW4223617322

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.