ArticleScientific reports2022
Risk factors for undergoing surgery in patients with newly diagnosed open-angle glaucoma.
Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Long-term effectiveness of the trabecular micro-bypass (iStent): 3-year real world data in glaucoma and ocular hypertension.International ophthalmology · 2025Article
- Association Between Preserved Glaucoma Eye Drops Exposure and Glaucoma Surgery Occurrence: A Nationwide 10-Year Outcome Study.Ophthalmology and therapy · 2025Article
- Association Between Greater Social Vulnerability and Delayed Glaucoma Surgery.American journal of ophthalmology · 2024Article
- Real-world evaluation of novel eye drop bottle sensors: Cloud-based AI support for eye drop adherence.Heliyon · 2024Article
- Social determinants of health and health disparities in glaucoma: A review.Clinical & experimental ophthalmology · 2024Review
- Big data to guide glaucoma treatment.Taiwan journal of ophthalmologyReview
- The Association between Socioeconomic Status and Structural or Functional Baseline Measurements for Patients Receiving a Trabeculectomy.Ophthalmology. GlaucomaArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite the clinical importance of glaucoma surgery, studies on its prevalence and risk factors are limited. We analyzed a database comprising approximately 1,000,000 Korean residents to investigate the prevalence and risk factors for undergoing glaucoma surgery within 5 years of diagnosis with open-angle glaucoma. Of the 4,303 patients evaluated, 226 (5.3%) underwent glaucoma surgery. Factors associated with the likelihood of glaucoma surgery included the use of two or more eye drops (odds ratio [OR], 30.30; 95% confidence interval [CI], 10.95-83.84), intake of oral carbonic anhydrase inhibitor (OR, 1.79; 95% CI, 1.23-2.61), age > 55 years (55-65 years: OR, 1.71; 95% CI, 1.06-2.76; > 65 years: OR 1.72; 95% CI, 1.10-2.70), female sex (OR, 1.46; 95% CI, 1.10-1.94), middle- and high-income (OR, 2.36; 95% CI, 1.30-4.28, OR, 1.86; 95% CI, 1.03-3.35, respectively), and metropolitan residence (OR, 1.61; 95% CI, 1.14-2.26). Our nomogram for predicting the likelihood of glaucoma surgery showed an acceptable result. In conclusion, older age, female sex, and the intensity of intraocular pressure lowering treatment increased the likelihood of undergoing glaucoma surgery. Our findings indicated that a lower socioeconomic status may forestall receiving this necessary surgery, which requires further attention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.