Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35383242›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Different methods of detaching adherent cells and their effects on the cell surface expression of Fas receptor and Fas ligand.

Ting-Yu Lai, Jerry Cao, Pu Ou-Yang, Ching-Yi Tsai, Chih-Wen Lin, Chien-Chia Chen, Meng-Kun Tsai, Chih-Yuan Lee

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 64 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Ting-Yu LaiInstitute of Molecular Medicine, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, No. 1 Jen-Ai Road, Sec. 1, Taipei, 10002, Taiwan.
Jerry CaoDepartment of Surgery, Wollongong Hospital, Loftus Street, Wollongong, NSW, 2500, Australia.
Pu Ou-YangDepartment of Medical Research, National Taiwan University Hospital, No. 7 Chung-Shan South Road, Taipei, 10002, Taiwan.
Ching-Yi TsaiDepartment of Medical Research, National Taiwan University Hospital, No. 7 Chung-Shan South Road, Taipei, 10002, Taiwan.
Chih-Wen LinDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, E-Da Dachang Hospital, and School of Medicine, College of Medicine, I-Shou University, No. 1, Sec. 1, Syuecheng Road, Dashu District, Kaohsiung City, 84001, Taiwan.
Chien-Chia ChenDepartment of Surgery, National Taiwan University Hospital and College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, No. 7, Chung-Shan South Road, Taipei, 10002, Taiwan.
Meng-Kun TsaiDepartment of Surgery, National Taiwan University Hospital and College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, No. 7, Chung-Shan South Road, Taipei, 10002, Taiwan.
Chih-Yuan LeeDepartment of Surgery, National Taiwan University Hospital and College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, No. 7, Chung-Shan South Road, Taipei, 10002, Taiwan. gs2119@gmail.com.
National Taiwan University Hospital · TWI-Shou University · TWNational Taiwan University · TWWollongong Hospital · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In cell culture environment, some cells adhere firmly to the culture plates and may be vulnerable to cell detachment during passage. Therefore, it is important to harvest cells with a proper detaching method to maintain the viability of cells after detachment. Trypsinization is frequently used for cellular dissociation and detachment. However, most surface proteins and the extracellular matrix are degraded by enzymatic digestion. A mild cell detachment buffer, accutase, is recommended for the replacement of trypsin to dissociate adherent cells and thereby avoid cellular damage. In this study, we demonstrated that use of accutase for cellular detachment may compromise some surface proteins. Compared with ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA)-based nonenzymatic cell dissociation buffers, accutase was associated with significant decreases in the surface Fas ligands and Fas receptors. Moreover, we found that accutase may be able to cleave surface Fas ligands into pieces. Our results also illustrated that surface proteins required 20 h to recover after accutase treatment. We demonstrated that using accutase to dissociate adherent cells compromised the expression of Fas ligands and Fas receptors on the cell surface. These findings indicate that it is important to choose suitable cell detachment buffers and allow cells to recover after detachment before experiments.

Indexed as

Cell Culture Techniquesfas ReceptorApoptosisFas Ligand ProteinTrypsinFas Ligand Proteinfas ReceptorTrypsin

Identifiers

PMID35383242
PMCPMC8983651
OpenAlexW4223582498

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.