Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35383240›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Impact of the biopsy forceps size on histological analysis and performances of the histological scoring systems.

Elettra Bianchi, Aurélie Najm, Sophie Vanbelle, Benoit Le Goff, Eugène Mutijima, Marie-Joëlle Kaiser, Michel Malaise, Jean-Philippe Hauzeur

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Pediatric discovery · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Elettra Bianchi *Department of Pathology, CHU Sart Tilman, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium.
Aurélie Najm *Department of Rheumatology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nantes, Pays de La Loire, Nantes, France.
Sophie VanbelleMethodology and Statistics, CAPHRI, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Benoit Le GoffDepartment of Rheumatology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nantes, Pays de La Loire, Nantes, France.
Eugène MutijimaDepartment of Pathology, CHU Sart Tilman, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium.
Marie-Joëlle KaiserDepartment of Rheumatology, CHU Sart Tilman, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium.
Michel MalaiseDepartment of Rheumatology, CHU Sart Tilman, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium.
Jean-Philippe HauzeurDepartment of Rheumatology, CHU Sart Tilman, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium. Jean-philippe@hauzeur.org.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To improve the reliability of the quantitative scorings of the synovial biopsies, we evaluate whether diameter of arthroscopic forceps influences histological quality of synovial tissue and/or histological scores and we compare the intra- and inter-observer performances of the main histological scoring systems. Synovial biopsies were retrieved in the same part of the joint using 1, 2 and 4 mm diameters grasping forceps. After standard staining and immunohistochemistry with anti-CD68 antibody, slides were scored blindly by 2 independent experienced operators for tissue quality and with Krenn score, de Bois-Tak score and CD68 semi-quantitative score. Four samples did not pass quality control. No difference other than a higher number of vessels in the 4 mm versus 2 mm forceps (p = 0.01) was found among the 3 groups. CD68 score was significantly higher in the 2 versus 4 mm forceps (p = 0.009). So we concluded that only vessels quantification and CD68 semi-quantitative score seemed affected by the forceps size. The intra-reader agreement was variable across observers and features: 0.78 (0.66-0.87) for the Krenn scoring system, 0.89 (0.78-0.97) for the de Bois-Tak score and 0.93 (0.81-1.00) for the CD68 score. Interobserver reliabilities of Krenn score, de Bois-Tak score and CD68 scores were satisfactory: 0.95 (0.92-0.99) for Krenn, 0.98 (0.96-0.99) for de Bois-Tak and 0.80 (0.71-0.89) for CD68.

Indexed as

Surgical InstrumentsSynovial MembraneBiopsyCell CountHumansObserver VariationReproducibility of Results

Identifiers

PMID35383240
PMCPMC8983678

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.