Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35383169›Full record

ArticleNature communications2022

Structural basis for the mechanisms of human presequence protease conformational switch and substrate recognition.

Wenguang G Liang, Juwina Wijaya, Hui Wei, Alex J Noble, Jordan M Mancl, Swansea Mo, David Lee, John V Lin King, Man Pan, Chang Liu and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Wenguang G LiangBen-May Department for Cancer Research, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Juwina WijayaDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Hui WeiNational Resource for Automated Molecular Microscopy, Simons Electron Microscopy Center, New York Structural Biology Center, New York, NY, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6777-1772
Alex J NobleNational Resource for Automated Molecular Microscopy, Simons Electron Microscopy Center, New York Structural Biology Center, New York, NY, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8634-2279
Jordan M ManclBen-May Department for Cancer Research, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Swansea MoBen-May Department for Cancer Research, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
David LeeDepartment of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7232-0968
John V Lin KingDepartment of Physiology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Man PanDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7216-8193
Chang LiuDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Carla M KoehlerDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Minglei ZhaoDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5832-6060
Clinton S PotterNational Resource for Automated Molecular Microscopy, Simons Electron Microscopy Center, New York Structural Biology Center, New York, NY, USA.
Bridget CarragherNational Resource for Automated Molecular Microscopy, Simons Electron Microscopy Center, New York Structural Biology Center, New York, NY, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0624-5020
Sheng LiDepartment of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9073-6809
Wei-Jen TangBen-May Department for Cancer Research, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA. wtang@bsd.uchicago.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8267-8995
University of Chicago · USNew York Structural Biology Center · USUniversity of California, Los Angeles · USUniversity of California San Diego · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

NCCAT: National Center for CryoEM Access and Training- Supplement for Windows 10 and FFIU24GM129539 · NIGMS · NEW YORK STRUCTURAL BIOLOGY CENTER · PI DE MARCO, ALEX, KIEFT, JEFFREY S · 2018 to 2023
$53.9M
TRD #3: An automated and streamlined pipeline for in-situ molecular microscopyP41GM103310 · NIGMS · SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE, THE · PI DE MARCO, ALEX, KIEFT, JEFFREY S · 2012 to 2021
$14.7M
Time resolved SAXS studies on the RP2/Arl3 complex pp.484-485P41GM103622 · NIGMS · ILLINOIS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI IRVING, THOMAS C · 2012 to 2020
$11.9M
Structure-function analysis and small molecule modulator discovery of human insulin degrading enzymeR01GM121964 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI TANG, WEI-JEN · 2017 to 2024
$3.1M
Structural and Functional Studies of Molecular Machines Involved in Chemical Modifications of MacromoleculesR35GM143052 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI ZHAO, MINGLEI · 2021 to 2025
$2.1M
NIGMS NIH HHS P41 GM103310NIGMS NIH HHS P41 GM103622NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM121964NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM143052NIGMS NIH HHS U24 GM129539
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Presequence protease (PreP), a 117 kDa mitochondrial M16C metalloprotease vital for mitochondrial proteostasis, degrades presequence peptides cleaved off from nuclear-encoded proteins and other aggregation-prone peptides, such as amyloid β (Aβ). PreP structures have only been determined in a closed conformation; thus, the mechanisms of substrate binding and selectivity remain elusive. Here, we leverage advanced vitrification techniques to overcome the preferential denaturation of one of two ~55 kDa homologous domains of PreP caused by air-water interface adsorption. Thereby, we elucidate cryoEM structures of three apo-PreP open states along with Aβ- and citrate synthase presequence-bound PreP at 3.3-4.6 Å resolution. Together with integrative biophysical and pharmacological approaches, these structures reveal the key stages of the PreP catalytic cycle and how the binding of substrates or PreP inhibitor drives a rigid body motion of the protein for substrate binding and catalysis. Together, our studies provide key mechanistic insights into M16C metalloproteases for future therapeutic innovations.

Indexed as

Amyloid beta-PeptidesMitochondriaCryoelectron MicroscopyHumansMetalloproteasesMolecular ConformationProtein ConformationSubstrate SpecificityAmyloid beta-PeptidesMetalloproteases

Identifiers

PMID35383169
PMCPMC8983764
OpenAlexW4226203193

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.