Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35383087›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2022

Understanding national trends in COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in Canada: results from five sequential cross-sectional representative surveys spanning April 2020-March 2021.

Kim Lavoie, Vincent Gosselin-Boucher, Jovana Stojanovic, Samir Gupta, Myriam Gagné, Keven Joyal-Desmarais, Katherine Séguin, Sherri Sheinfeld Gorin, Paula Ribeiro, Brigitte Voisard and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Individual and Environmental Correlations with Vaccination Status in Canada: The COHESION study.Journal of urban health : bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Factors Impacting COVID-19 Vaccine Uptake and Confidence Among Immigrant and Refugee Populations in Canada.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Delay discounting predicts COVID-19 vaccine booster willingness.Cognitive research: principles and implications · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. 'Is It Safe? Is it not?' A Youth-Led Photovoice Study of Youth Perspectives of COVID-19 Vaccine Confidence.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Kim LavoiePsychology, Université du Québec à Montréal, Montreal, Québec, Canada lavoie.kim@uqam.ca.ORCID 0000-0003-2606-1357
Vincent Gosselin-BoucherPsychology, Université du Québec à Montréal, Montreal, Québec, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-3030-6022
Jovana StojanovicMontreal Behavioural Medicine Centre, CIUSSS-NIM Research Centre, Montreal, Québec, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-3984-5241
Samir GuptaKeenan Research Center, St Michael's Hospital Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-7307-6247
Myriam GagnéMedicine, St Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-0559-5731
Keven Joyal-DesmaraisMontreal Behavioural Medicine Centre, CIUSSS-NIM Research Centre, Montreal, Québec, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-0657-8367
Katherine SéguinPsychology, Université du Québec à Montréal, Montreal, Québec, Canada.
Sherri Sheinfeld GorinFamily Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5346-0997
Paula RibeiroMontreal Behavioural Medicine Centre, CIUSSS-NIM Research Centre, Montreal, Québec, Canada.
Brigitte VoisardPsychology, Université du Québec à Montréal, Montreal, Québec, Canada.
Michael VallisFamily Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-0165-5936
Kimberly CoracePsychiatry, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Justin PresseauClinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-2132-0703
Simon BaconMontreal Behavioural Medicine Centre, CIUSSS-NIM Research Centre, Montreal, Québec, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-7075-0358
iCARE Study Team
Centre Intégré Universitaire de Santé et de Services Sociaux du Centre-Sud-de-l'Île-de-Montréal · CAUniversité du Québec à Montréal · CASt. Michael's Hospital · CAUniversity of Ottawa · CADalhousie University · CAMichigan Medicine · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo examine rates of vaccine hesitancy and their correlates among Canadian adults between April 2020 and March 2021.

designFive sequential cross-sectional age, sex and province-weighted population-based samples who completed online surveys.

settingCanada.

participantsA total of 15 019 Canadians aged 18 years and over were recruited through a recognised polling firm (Leger Opinion). Respondents were 51.5% female with a mean age of 48.1 (SD 17.2) years (range 18-95 years) and predominantly white (80.8%). PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Rates of vaccine hesitancy over the five surveys (time points) and their sociodemographic, clinical and psychological correlates.

resultsA total of 42.2% of respondents reported some degree of vaccine hesitancy, which was lowest during surveys 1 (April 2020) and 5 (March 2021) and highest during survey 3 (November 2020). Fully adjusted multivariate logistic regression analyses revealed that women, those aged 50 and younger, non-white, those with high school education or less, and those with annual household incomes below the poverty line in Canada were significantly more likely to report vaccine hesitancy, as were essential and healthcare workers, parents of children under the age of 18 and those who do not get regular influenza vaccines. Endorsing prevention behaviours as important for reducing virus transmission and high COVID-19 health concerns were associated with 77% and 54% reduction in vaccine hesitancy, respectively. Having high personal financial concerns was associated with 1.33 times increased odds of vaccine hesitancy.

conclusionsResults highlight the importance of targeting vaccine efforts to specific groups by emphasising the outsized health benefits compared with risks of vaccination. Future research should monitor changes in vaccine intentions and behaviour to better understand underlying factors.

Indexed as

COVID-19Influenza VaccinesAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCanadaChildCOVID-19 VaccinesCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSARS-CoV-2Surveys and QuestionnairesCOVID-19 VaccinesInfluenza VaccinesCOVID-19infection controlpublic health

Identifiers

PMID35383087
PMCPMC8983402
OpenAlexW4225584228

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.