Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35383084›Full record

ReviewBMJ open2022

Transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in educational settings in 2020: a review.

Constantine Vardavas, Katerina Nikitara, Alexander G Mathioudakis, Michele Hilton Boon, Revati Phalkey, Jo Leonardi-Bee, Anastasia Pharris, Charlotte Deogan, Jonathan E Suk

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Limited transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in schools in Ireland during the 2020-2021 school year.Euro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin · 2023
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Constantine VardavasSchool of Medicine, University of Crete, Heraklion, Greece.
Katerina NikitaraSchool of Medicine, University of Crete, Heraklion, Greece.ORCID 0000-0002-7270-6278
Alexander G MathioudakisImmunity and Respiratory Medicine, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Michele Hilton BoonWISE Centre for Economic Justice, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2240-7923
Revati PhalkeyDivision of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Nottingham School of Medicine, Nottingham, UK.
Jo Leonardi-BeeDivision of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Nottingham School of Medicine, Nottingham, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0893-6068
Anastasia PharrisEpidemic Prone Diseases, Coronavirus and Influenza, Disease Programmes Unit, European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control, Solna, Sweden.
Charlotte DeoganEpidemic Prone Diseases, Coronavirus and Influenza, Disease Programmes Unit, European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control, Solna, Sweden.
Jonathan E SukEmergency Preparedness and Response Support, Public Health Functions Unit, European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control, Solna, Sweden jonathan.suk@ecdc.europa.eu.ORCID 0000-0003-4689-4583

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesSchool closures have been used as a core non-pharmaceutical intervention (NPI) during the COVID-19 pandemic. This review aims at identifying SARS-CoV-2 transmission in educational settings during the first waves of the pandemic.

methodsThis literature review assessed studies published between December 2019 and 1 April 2021 in Medline and Embase, which included studies that assessed educational settings from approximately January 2020 to January 2021. The inclusion criteria were based on the PCC framework (P-Population, C-Concept, C-Context). The study

resultsFifteen studies met inclusion criteria, ranging from daycare centres to high schools and summer camps, while eight studies assessed the re-opening of schools in the 2020-2021 school year. In principle, although there is sufficient evidence that children can both be infected by and transmit SARS-CoV-2 in school settings, the SAR remain relatively low-when NPI measures are implemented in parallel. Moreover, although the evidence was limited, there was an indication that younger children may have a lower SAR than adolescents.

conclusionsTransmission in educational settings in 2020 was minimal-when NPI measures were implemented in parallel. However, with an upsurge of cases related to variants of concern, continuous surveillance and assessment of the evidence is warranted to ensure the maximum protection of the health of students and the educational workforce, while also minimising the numerous negative impacts that school closures may have on children.

Indexed as

COVID-19SARS-CoV-2AdolescentAdultChildChild, PreschoolHumansInfantInfant, NewbornPandemicsSchoolsStudentscommunity child healthCOVID-19public health

Identifiers

PMID35383084
PMCPMC8983413

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.