Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35383064›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2022

Modeling the potential impacts of improved monthly income on child stunting in India: a subnational geospatial perspective.

Satvik Kishore, Tinku Thomas, Harshpal Sachdev, Anura V Kurpad, Patrick Webb

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Satvik KishoreNutrition, St John's Research Institute, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.ORCID 0000-0003-2827-492X
Tinku ThomasDivision of Biostatistics, St John's Research Institute, Bangalore, Karnataka, India.ORCID 0000-0002-1786-6076
Harshpal SachdevDepartment of Paediatrics, Sitaram Bhartia Institute of Science and Research, New Delhi, Delhi, India.
Anura V KurpadDivision of Nutrition, St John's Medical College, Bangalore, Karnataka, India.
Patrick WebbFriedman School of Nutrition, Tufts University, Medford, Massachusetts, USA patrick.webb@tufts.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-9857-3354

Funding

DBT-Wellcome Trust India Alliance IA/CRC/19/1/610006Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesApproximately one-third of the world's stunted (low height-for-age) preschool-aged children live in India. The success of interventions designed to tackle stunting appears to vary by location and depth of poverty. We developed small-area estimation models to assess the potential impact of increments in household income on stunting across the country.

designTwo nationally representative cross-sectional datasets were used: India's National Family Health Survey 4 (2015-2016) and the 68th round of the National Sample Survey on consumer expenditure. The two datasets were combined with statistical matching. Gaussian process regressions were used to perform geospatial modelling of 'stunting' controlling for household wealth and other covariates. SETTING AND

participantsThe number of children in this sample totalled 259 627. Children with implausible height-for-age z-scores (HAZs) >5 or <-5, or missing data on drinking water, sanitation facility, mother's education, or geolocation and children not residing in mainland India were excluded, resulting in 207 695 observations for analysis.

resultsA monthly transfer of ~$7 (500 Indian rupees) per capita to every household (not targeted or conditional) was estimated to reduce stunting nationally by 3.8 percentage points on average (95% credible interval: 0.14%-10%), but with substantial variation by state. Estimated reduction in stunting varied by wealth of households, with the poorest quintile being likely to benefit the most.

conclusionImproving household income, which can be supported through cash transfers, has the potential to significantly reduce stunting in parts of India where the burdens of both stunting and poverty are high. Modelling shows that for other regions, income transfers may raise incomes and contribute to improved nutrition, but there would be a need for complementary activities for alleviating stunting. While having value for the country as a whole, impact of income gained could be variable, and underlying drivers of stunting need to be tackled through supplementary interventions.

Indexed as

Growth DisordersIncomeBody HeightChildChild, PreschoolCross-Sectional StudiesHumansIndiaInfantPovertycommunity child healthnutritionnutrition & dieteticspublic healthstatistics & research methods

Identifiers

PMID35383064
PMCPMC8984000

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.