Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35383055›Full record

SynthesisBMJ open2022

Identifying and understanding the factors that influence the functioning of integrated healthcare systems in the NHS: a systematic literature review.

Karthik Bhat, Rokshan Easwarathasan, Milan Jacob, William Poole, Vithullan Sapaetharan, Manu Sidhu, Ashvin Thomas

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Networks for healthcare delivery: a systematic literature review.Journal of health organization and management · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. International research priorities for integrated care and cross-boundary working: an electronic Delphi study.International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. "It's My Life and It's Now or Never"-Transplant Recipients Empowered From a Service-Dominant Logic Perspective.Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Karthik Bhat *Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9906-747X
Rokshan Easwarathasan *Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK rokshan.easwarathasan16@imperial.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-4264-4472
Milan Jacob *Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3511-8650
William Poole *Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9251-8004
Vithullan Sapaetharan *Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5269-4946
Manu Sidhu *Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5921-8915
Ashvin Thomas *Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9957-8686

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe National Health Service has been moving towards integrated care for the best part of two decades to address the growing financial and service pressures created by an ageing population. Integrated healthcare systems (IHSs) join up health and social care services and have been established to manage the care of individuals with complex chronic conditions but with varied success. It is therefore imperative to conduct a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) to identify and understand the factors that influence their successful functioning, and ascertain the factor with the greatest influence, in order to ensure positive outcomes when establishing future IHSs.

methodsArticles published between 1 January 1997 and 8 March 2020 were analysed from the following six databases: Healthcare Management Information Consortium, Nuffield Trust, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, PubMed, National Institute for Health and Care Excellence Evidence and Health Systems Evidence. Those deemed relevant after title and abstract screening were procured for subsequent review of the full-text article.

resultsThirty-three finalised articles were analysed in this SLR to provide a comprehensive overview of the factors that influence the functioning of IHSs. Factors were stratified into six key categories: organisational culture, workforce management, interorganisational collaboration, leadership ability of staff, economic factors and political factors. Leadership was deemed to be the most influential factor due to its intrinsic and instrumental role in influencing the other key factors.

conclusionsThe findings of this SLR may serve as a guide to developing tailor-made recommendations and policies that address the identified key factors and thereby improve the functioning of present and future IHSs. Furthermore, due to both its overarching influence and the inadequacy of literature in this field, there is a strong case for further research exploring leadership development specifically for IHSs.

Indexed as

Delivery of Health Care, IntegratedPersonnel ManagementHumansLeadershipState Medicinehealth policyhealth services administration & managementhuman resource managementorganisational developmentorganisation of health servicesquality in health care

Identifiers

PMID35383055
PMCPMC8984012

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.