Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35383054›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2022

Impact of the COVID-19 lockdown on psychological health and nutritional habits in Italy: results from the #PRESTOinsieme study.

Giulia Lorenzoni, Danila Azzolina, Elisabetta Maresio, Silvia Gallipoli, Marco Ghidina, Solidea Baldas, Paola Berchialla, Maria Cecilia Giron, Marco Silano, Dario Gregori and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Giulia LorenzoniUnit of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Public Health, Department of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular Sciences, and Public Health, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.
Danila AzzolinaUnit of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Public Health, Department of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular Sciences, and Public Health, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.
Elisabetta MaresioPsychotherapy Unit Prochild Onlus, Trieste, Italy.
Silvia GallipoliZeta Research Ltd, Trieste, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2635-1936
Marco GhidinaZeta Research Ltd, Trieste, Italy.
Solidea BaldasUniversity of Padova School of Medicine and Surgery, Padova, Italy.
Paola BerchiallaDepartment of Clinical and Biological Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5835-5638
Maria Cecilia GironDepartment of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.
Marco SilanoUnit of Human Nutrition and Health, Department of Food Safety, Nutrition and Veterinary Public Health, Italian National Institute of Health, Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7051-3405
Dario GregoriUnit of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Public Health, Department of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular Sciences, and Public Health, University of Padova, Padova, Italy dario.gregori@unipd.it.ORCID 0000-0001-7906-0580
#PRESTOinsieme Study Group
University of Padua · ITMinistero della Salute · ITUniversity of Turin · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe present work aims to present the results of the '

designCross-sectional online survey disseminated by messaging apps (ie, WhatsApp and Telegram) and social networks (ie, Instagram, Facebook and LinkedIn).

settingItaly.

participantsItalian population older than 16 years of age. EXPOSURE: COVID-19 lockdown. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Survey respondents filled out a set of validated questionnaires aimed at assessing lifestyle habits and psychological health, that is, the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12) to screen for psychological distress, the Impact of Event Scale-Revised (IES-R) to screen for post-traumatic stress and the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D).

resultsSurvey respondents totalled 5008. Moderate or severe psychological distress was reported in 25.5% and 22% of survey respondents, respectively. Lower age, female gender, being unemployed (OR 1.57, 95% CI 1.22 to 2.02) or being a student (OR 1.73, 95% CI 1.31 to 2.28) were predictors of more severe depressive symptoms.

conclusionsThe present study is one of the largest population-based surveys conducted in Italy during the first COVID-19 lockdown, providing valuable data about the Italian population's psychological health. Further studies should be conducted to understand whether psychological distress persists after the end of the lockdown.

Indexed as

COVID-19AnxietyCommunicable Disease ControlCross-Sectional StudiesDepressionFemaleHabitsHumansItalySARS-CoV-2Stress, PsychologicalSurveys and Questionnairesanxiety disordersCOVID-19nutrition & dieteticspublic health

Identifiers

PMID35383054
PMCPMC8983406
OpenAlexW4223971796

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.