Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35383052›Full record

Trial reportBMJ open2022

How the 'HIV/TB co-epidemic-HIV stigma-TB stigma' syndemic impacts on the use of occupational health services for TB in South African hospitals: a structural equation modelling analysis of the baseline data from the HaTSaH Study (cluster RCT).

Edwin Wouters, André Janse van Rensburg, Michelle Engelbrecht, Veerle Buffel, Linda Campbell, Nina Sommerland, Asta Rau, G Kigozi, Josefien van Olmen, Caroline Masquillier

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Edwin WoutersCentre for Population, Family & Health, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium edwin.wouters@uantwerpen.be.ORCID 0000-0003-2268-3829
André Janse van RensburgCentre for Rural Health, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa.
Michelle EngelbrechtCentre for Health Systems Research & Development, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein, Free State, South Africa.
Veerle BuffelCentre for Population, Family & Health, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-6602-9525
Linda CampbellCentre for Population, Family & Health, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
Nina SommerlandOffice for National Statistics, London, UK.
Asta RauCentre for Health Systems Research & Development, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein, Free State, South Africa.
G KigoziCentre for Health Systems Research & Development, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein, Free State, South Africa.
Josefien van OlmenFamily and Population Health, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
Caroline MasquillierCentre for Population, Family & Health, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
University of Antwerp · BEUniversity of the Free State · ZAOffice for National Statistics · GBUniversity of KwaZulu-Natal · ZA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionTuberculosis (TB) has become an occupational health hazard in South African hospitals where healthcare workers (HCWs) are additionally confronted daily with HIV and its associated stigma, causing a

designA cross-sectional study using the baseline data from the HIV and TB Stigma among Healthcare workers Study (HaTSaH Study).

settingSix hospitals in the Free State province of South Africa.

participants820 HCWs of the six selected hospitals.

resultsThe study results demonstrate that the co-epidemic (β=0.399 (screening model) and β=0.345 (treatment model)) combined (interaction effect: β=0.133 (screening) and β=0.132 (treatment)) with the persistent stigmatisation of HIV is altering the attitudes towards TB (β=0.345 (screening) and β=0.400 (treatment)), where the stigmatising views of HIV are transferred to TB-illustrating the syndemic impact. Our model demonstrated that this syndemic not only leads to higher levels of internal TB stigma (β=0.421 (screening) and β=0.426 (treatment)), but also to a lower willingness to use the OHU for TB screening (probit coefficient=-0.216) and treatment (probit coefficient=-0.160). Confidentiality consistently emerged as a contextual correlate of OHU use.

conclusionsTheoretically, our results confirm HIV as a 'syndemic generator' which changes the social meaning of TB in the hospital context. Practically, the study demonstrated that the syndemic of TB and HIV in a highly endemic context with stigma impacts the intended use of occupational TB services. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Pre-results of the trial registered at the South African National Clinical Trials Register, registration ID: DOH-27-1115-5204.

Indexed as

HIV InfectionsOccupational Health ServicesTuberculosisCross-Sectional StudiesHospitalsHumansLatent Class AnalysisSocial StigmaSouth AfricaSurveys and QuestionnairesSyndemicHIV & AIDSoccupational & industrial medicinetuberculosis

Identifiers

PMID35383052
PMCPMC8984004
OpenAlexW4224313690

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.