ArticleTurkish archives of pediatrics2022
Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Management in Pediatric Intensive Care Units in Turkey: A Prospective Survey.
Article in Turkish archives of pediatrics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Global Research Trends in Pediatric Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: A Bibliometric Analysis from 2014 To 2024.Journal of epidemiology and global health · 2025Article
- Evaluation of Patients with Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Followed on Mechanical Ventilator in a Tertiary Pediatric Intensive Care and the Factors That May Be Associated with Death in These Patients.Turkish archives of pediatrics · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis study aimed to explore the compliance of management strategies for pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome in pediatric intensive care units in Turkey with current guidelines. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis is a cross-sectional, prospective survey study. We delivered the survey, consisting of questions on topics in the relevant literature on acute respiratory distress syndrome management in children (1 month-18 years), to the heads/staff of the 100 units via email or phone.
resultsIn total, 51 (51%) out of 100 targeted pediatric intensive care units responded to the survey. We found out that 17 (33%) units comply with no acute respiratory distress syndrome guideline, while 65% frequently utilize cuffed endotracheal tubes. The majority of the units (86%) achieve their mechanical ventilation targets with the help of pressure control modes. Besides, steroid and surfactant use are present in 47% and 45% of the units, respectively, while 16% and 38% of the units use inhaled nitric oxide and high-frequency oscillatory ventilation, respectively.
conclusionLung-protective ventilation strategies preventing ventilator-associated lung injury are explicit in all responding units. The present survey revealed that current mechanical ventilation and non-ventilation treatment strategies in pediatric ARDS in Turkey are relatively uniform and largely consistent with international practices.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.