Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35383013›Full record

ArticleTurkish archives of pediatrics2022

Use of Therapeutic Plasma Exchange in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit.

Ahmet Gökcan Öztürk, Zeynep Erva Küçük, Serhan Özcan, Merve Havan, Emrah Gün, Edin Botan, Tanıl Kendirli

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Turkish archives of pediatrics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Safety and Efficacy of Therapeutic Plasma Exchange in Pediatric Non-Neurological Diseases.International journal of nephrology and renovascular disease · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ahmet Gökcan ÖztürkDepartment of Pediatrics, Ankara University, Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.
Zeynep Erva KüçükDepartment of Pediatrics, Ankara University, Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.
Serhan ÖzcanDivison of Pediatric Critical Care Medicine, Ankara University, Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.
Merve HavanDivison of Pediatric Critical Care Medicine, Ankara University, Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.
Emrah GünDivison of Pediatric Critical Care Medicine, Ankara University, Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.
Edin BotanDivison of Pediatric Critical Care Medicine, Ankara University, Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.
Tanıl KendirliDivison of Pediatric Critical Care Medicine, Ankara University, Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.
Ankara University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTherapeutic plasma exchange has been used as a primary or supportive treatment in many diseases in recent years and has achieved satisfactory results in lots of diseases in children. Therapeutic plasma exchange procedure is changing plasma component of a patient's blood with the new plasma as a replacement solution. The aim of this study is to share our experience of therapeutic plasma exchange on varying indications in critically ill children who were accepted to our pediatric intensive care unit. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe conducted this study between December 2010 and February 2020, retrospectively. Patients' data such as age, sex, indication, number of sessions, vascular access route, and type of replacement fluid used were obtained from medical records. Indications for therapeutic plasma exchange were classified according to the 2019 American Society for Apheresis categorization. The patient's follow-up, clinical courses, therapeutic plasma exchange season count, complications, and outcome were evaluated according to each indications and their overall condition.

resultsThis study included a total of the 84 patients who underwent therapeutic plasma exchange, and their median (minimum-maximum) ages were 7.07 years (0.2-18), 57.1% were male (n = 48) and 42.9% were female (n = 36). A total of 463 sessions of therapeutic plasma exchange were performed in 84 patients. The most common indication was thrombocytopenia-associated multi-organ failure with sepsis (40.4%, n = 34) followed by liver failure/hepatic encephalopathy (28.5%, n = 24) and autoimmune encephalitis (9.5%, n = 8), and according to The American Society for Apheresis 2019 category, patients distributions were as follows: 15.4% of the patients were placed in category 1 (n = 13), 5.9% in category 2 (n = 5), 77.3% in category 3 (n = 65), and 1.1% in category 4 (n = 1). Therapeutic plasma exchange was combined to extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in 10 patients (11.9%) and continuous renal replacement therapies in 39 (46.4%) patients. Finally, the survival rate was 50% in all patients, and the lowest survival rate was 41.5% (n = 27) in category 3 group.

conclusionTherapeutic plasma exchange is enlarging to varying indications and showing to be more effective on a lot of disorders in children. Also, it is available in pediatric age groups and in different states like combined with other extracorporeal therapies.

Identifiers

PMID35383013
PMCPMC9366156
OpenAlexW4221034427

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.