Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35383008›Full record

ArticleTurkish archives of pediatrics2022

Assessment and Correction of Stress in Preterm Infants and Their Mothers.

Iryna Sarapuk, Halyna Pavlyshyn

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Turkish archives of pediatrics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Peculiarities of melatonin levels in preterm infants.Wiener klinische Wochenschrift · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Iryna SarapukDepartment of Pediatrics, I. Horbachevsky Ternopil National Medical University, Ternopil, Ukraine.
Halyna PavlyshynDepartment of Pediatrics, I. Horbachevsky Ternopil National Medical University, Ternopil, Ukraine.
I.Horbachevsky Ternopil National Medical University · UA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo investigate how skin-to-skin contact influences the stress levels in preterm infants in the neonatal intensive care unit and their mothers. MATERIALS AND

methodsThe study included 60 preterm infants with gestational age less than 32 weeks, who were treated in the neonatal intensive care unit, and their mothers. The overall design was a baseline-response design. Saliva was collected before (baseline) and after skinto-skin contact to measure free cortisol by enzyme immunoassay method.

resultsInfant baseline salivary cortisol level was 0.587 [0.239; 1.714] μg/dL. It was significantly higher in neonates who had invasive ventilation (1.00 [0.38; 2.44]) μg/dL compared to non-ventilated infants (0.335 [0.156; 1.236]) μg/dL, P = .022 and was positively correlated with the duration of ventilation (r = 0.70; P = .0000). Maternal baseline salivary cortisol level was 0.212 [0.123; 0.378] μg/dL. There was significant decreasing of salivary cortisol after Kangaroo mother care with skin-to-skin contact in infants (0.162 [0.111; 0.231]) μg/dL, P < .001 and mothers (0.096 [0.077; 0.156]) μg/dL, P < .001.

conclusionPreterm infants in the neonatal intensive care unit and their mothers experience stress which can be confirmed by the increased baseline cortisol levels. Kangaroo mother care with skin-to-skin contact reduces the stress and normalizes salivary cortisol levels in both the infant in the neonatal intensive care unit and the mother.

Identifiers

PMID35383008
PMCPMC9366232
OpenAlexW4220758376

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.