ArticleAdvances in simulation (London, England)2022
The state of distance healthcare simulation during the COVID-19 pandemic: results of an international survey.
Article in Advances in simulation (London, England), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.
- Medicine and motherhood: a cross-sectional survey of the experiences of women doctors in the Republic of Ireland.BMC women's health · 2026Article
- The Advocacy-Inquiry Rubric (AIR): a standard to build debriefing and feedback skills.Advances in simulation (London, England) · 2025Article
- Simulation-based medical education in Canadian anesthesiology academic institutions: a national survey.Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie · 2024Article
- The Growing Need for Web-Based Simulation in Low- and Middle-Income Countries.JNMA; journal of the Nepal Medical Association · 2024Review
- Distanced Large Group Simulations as a Learning Method for Interprofessional Collaboration.Nursing reports (Pavia, Italy) · 2024Article
- Creation of a Virtual Reality Telesimulation Program in Response to Mandatory COVID-19 Social Distancing During the Pandemic: A Primer for Those considering VR Simulation and Application to a Group of Physicians Naive to Virtual Reality.Journal of medical extended reality · 2024Article
- Remote feedback in endovascular simulation training: a mixed-methods study.Advances in simulation (London, England) · 2024Article
- Perioperative crisis resource management simulation training in anaesthesia.Indian journal of anaesthesia · 2024Article
- Distance simulation in the health professions: a scoping review.Advances in simulation (London, England) · 2023Article
- A scoping review of remote facilitation during simulation-based healthcare education.BMC medical education · 2023Article
- Implementation of a North American pediatric emergency medicine simulation curriculum using the virtual resuscitation room.AEM education and training · 2023Article
- Radiography education in 2022 and beyond - Writing the history of the present: A narrative review.Radiography (London, England : 1995) · 2023Review
- Evaluation of an Online Learning Concept for Nursing Students in Caring for Patients with Dementia: Results of a Questionnaire Survey.Nursing reports (Pavia, Italy) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 10 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe coronavirus pandemic continues to shake the embedded structures of traditional in-person education across all learning levels and across the globe. In healthcare simulation, the pandemic tested the innovative and technological capabilities of simulation programs, educators, operations staff, and administration. This study aimed to answer the question: What is the state of distance simulation practice in 2021?
methodsThis was an IRB-approved, 34-item open survey for any profession involved in healthcare simulation disseminated widely and internationally in seven languages from January 14, 2021, to March 3, 2021. Development followed a multistep process of expert design, testing, piloting, translation, and recruitment. The survey asked questions to understand: Who was using distance simulation? What driving factors motivated programs to initiate distance sim? For what purposes was distance sim being used? What specific types or modalities of distance simulation were occurring? How was it being used (i.e., modalities, blending of technology and resources and location)? How did the early part of the pandemic differ from the latter half of 2020 and early 2021? What information would best support future distance simulation education? Data were cleaned, compiled, and analyzed for dichotomized responses, reporting frequencies, proportions, as well as a comparison of response proportions.
resultsFrom 32 countries, 618 respondents were included in the analysis. The findings included insights into the prevalence of distance simulation before, during, and after the pandemic; drivers for using distance simulation; methods and modalities of distance simulation; and staff training. The majority of respondents (70%) reported that their simulation center was conducting distance simulation. Significantly more respondents indicated long-term plans for maintaining a hybrid format (82%), relative to going back to in-person simulation (11%, p < 0.001).
conclusionThis study gives a perspective into the rapid adaptation of the healthcare simulation community towards distance teaching and learning in reaction to a radical and quick change in education conditions and environment caused by COVID-19, as well as future directions to pursue understanding and support of distance simulation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.