Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35382857›Full record

ArticleJournal of translational medicine2022

Basal and one-month differed neutrophil, lymphocyte and platelet values and their ratios strongly predict the efficacy of checkpoint inhibitors immunotherapy in patients with advanced BRAF wild-type melanoma.

Michele Guida, Nicola Bartolomeo, Davide Quaresmini, Pietro Quaglino, Gabriele Madonna, Jacopo Pigozzo, Anna Maria Di Giacomo, Alessandro Marco Minisini, Marco Tucci, Francesco Spagnolo and 10 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of translational medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
8.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 65 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. S100A9Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 10 institutions in 1 country.

Michele GuidaRare Tumors and Melanoma Unit, IRCCS Istituto Tumori "Giovanni Paolo II", Viale O. Flacco, 6570124, Bari, Italy. m.guida@oncologico.bari.it.ORCID 0000-0001-8411-0319
Nicola BartolomeoDepartment of Biomedical Sciences and Human Oncology, University of Bari, Bari, Italy.
Davide QuaresminiRare Tumors and Melanoma Unit, IRCCS Istituto Tumori "Giovanni Paolo II", Viale O. Flacco, 6570124, Bari, Italy.
Pietro QuaglinoDepartment of Medical Sciences, Dermatologic Clinic, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Gabriele MadonnaDepartment of Melanoma, Cancer Immunotherapy and Development Therapeutics, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione "G. Pascale", Napoli, Italy.
Jacopo PigozzoMelanoma Oncology Unit, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCCS, Padova, Italy.
Anna Maria Di GiacomoCenter for Immuno-Oncology, University Hospital of Siena, University of Siena, Siena, Italy.
Alessandro Marco MinisiniDepartment of Oncology, Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria del Friuli Centrale, Udine, Italy.
Marco TucciMedical Oncology Unit, University of Bari Aldo Moro, Bari, Italy.
Francesco SpagnoloSkin Cancer Unit, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy.
Marcella OccelliOncology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera Santa Croce e Carle, Cuneo, Italy.
Laura RidolfiImmunotherapy, Cell Therapy and Biobank Unit, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo Per Lo Studio Dei Tumori (IRST) "Dino Amadori", Meldola, Italy.
Paola QueiroloDivision of Melanoma Sarcoma and Rare Tumors, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS Milan, Milan, Italy.
Ivana De RisiRare Tumors and Melanoma Unit, IRCCS Istituto Tumori "Giovanni Paolo II", Viale O. Flacco, 6570124, Bari, Italy.
Monica ValenteCenter for Immuno-Oncology, Medical Oncology and Immunotherapy, Department of Oncology, University Hospital of Siena, Siena, Italy.
Angela Monica SciacovelliRare Tumors and Melanoma Unit, IRCCS Istituto Tumori "Giovanni Paolo II", Bari, Italy.
Vanna Chiarion SileniMelanoma Oncology Unit, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCCS, Padova, Italy.
Paolo Antonio AsciertoDepartment of Melanoma, Cancer Immunotherapy and Development Therapeutics, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione "G. Pascale", Napoli, Italy.
Lucia StiglianoDepartment of Medical Sciences, Dermatologic Clinic, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Sabino StrippoliRare Tumors and Melanoma Unit, IRCCS Istituto Tumori "Giovanni Paolo II", Viale O. Flacco, 6570124, Bari, Italy.
Istituto Tumori Bari · ITIstituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS "Fondazione G. Pascale" · ITIstituto Oncologico Veneto · ITUniversity of Turin · ITAzienda Sanitaria Ospedaliera S.Croce e Carle Cuneo · ITEuropean Institute of Oncology · ITIstituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori · ITOspedale Policlinico San Martino · ITUniversity of Bari Aldo Moro · ITUniversity of Siena · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo evaluate the capability of basal and one-month differed white blood cells (WBC), neutrophil, lymphocyte and platelet values and their ratios (neutrophils-to-lymphocytes ratio, NLR, and platelets-to-lymphocytes ratio, PLR) in predicting the response to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) in metastatic melanoma (MM).

methodsWe performed a retrospective study of 272 BRAF wild-type MM patients treated with first line ICI. Bivariable analysis was used to correlate patient/tumor characteristics with clinical outcomes. Variations between time 1 and time 0 (Δ) of blood parameters were also calculated and dichotomized using cut-off values assessed by ROC curve.

resultsAt baseline, higher neutrophils and NLR negatively correlated with PFS, OS and disease control rate (DCR). Higher PLR was also associated with worse OS. In multivariable analysis, neutrophils (p = 0.003), WBC (p = 0.069) and LDH (p = 0.07) maintained their impact on PFS, while OS was affected by LDH (p < 0.001), neutrophils (p < 0.001) and PLR (p = 0.022), while DCR by LDH (p = 0.03) and neutrophils (p = 0.004). In the longitudinal analysis, PFS negatively correlated with higher Δplatelets (p = 0.039), ΔWBC (p < 0.001), and Δneutrophils (p = 0.020), and with lower Δlymphocytes (p < 0.001). Moreover, higher ΔNLR and ΔPLR identified patients with worse PFS, OS and DCR. In the multivariable model, only ΔNLR influenced PFS (p = 0.004), while OS resulted affected by higher ΔWBC (p < 0.001) and lower Δlymphocytes (p = 0.038). Higher ΔWBC also affected the DCR (p = 0.003). When clustering patients in 4 categories using basal LDH and ΔNLR, normal LDH/lower ΔNLR showed a higher PFS than high LDH/higher ΔNLR (20 vs 5 months). Moreover, normal LDH/higher Δlymphocytes had a higher OS than high LDH/lower Δlymphocytes (50 vs. 10 months).

conclusionsBaseline and early variations of blood cells, together with basal LDH, strongly predict the efficacy of ICI in MM. Our findings propose simple, inexpensive biomarkers for a better selection of patient treatments. Prospective multicenter studies are warranted to confirm these data.

Indexed as

MelanomaNeutrophilsBlood PlateletsHumansImmunotherapyLymphocytesPrognosisProspective StudiesProto-Oncogene Proteins B-rafRetrospective StudiesBRAF protein, humanProto-Oncogene Proteins B-rafCheckpoint inhibitorsMetastatic melanomaNeutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratioPlatelet-to-lymphocyte ratio

Identifiers

PMID35382857
PMCPMC8981693
OpenAlexW4223590305

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.