Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35382844›Full record

ArticleTrials2022

The RIO trial: rationale, design, and the role of community involvement in a randomised placebo-controlled trial of antiretroviral therapy plus dual long-acting HIV-specific broadly neutralising antibodies (bNAbs) in participants diagnosed with recent HIV infection-study protocol for a two-stage randomised phase II trial.

Ming Jie Lee, Simon Collins, Daphne Babalis, Nicholas Johnson, Emanuela Falaschetti, A Toby Prevost, Ambreen Ashraf, Milaana Jacob, Tom Cole, Lisa Hurley and 14 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. CD8Nature · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors at 9 institutions in 2 countries.

Ming Jie LeeDepartment of Infectious Disease, Imperial College London, London, UK. minglee@doctors.org.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5244-0070
Simon CollinsHIV i-Base, London, UK.
Daphne BabalisImperial Clinical Trials Unit, School of Public health, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Nicholas JohnsonImperial Clinical Trials Unit, School of Public health, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Emanuela FalaschettiImperial Clinical Trials Unit, School of Public health, Imperial College London, London, UK.
A Toby PrevostKing's Clinical Trials Unit, King's College London, London, UK.
Ambreen AshrafImperial Clinical Trials Unit, School of Public health, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Milaana JacobImperial Clinical Trials Unit, School of Public health, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Tom ColeImperial Clinical Trials Unit, School of Public health, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Lisa HurleyNIHR Imperial Clinical Research Facility, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Matthew PacePeter Medawar Building for Pathogen Research, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Ane OgbePeter Medawar Building for Pathogen Research, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Maryam KhanDepartment of Infectious Disease, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Panagiota ZacharopoulouPeter Medawar Building for Pathogen Research, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Helen BrownPeter Medawar Building for Pathogen Research, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Euan SutherlandImperial College Clinical Trials Centre, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK.
Hanna BoxDepartment of Infectious Disease, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Julie FoxHarrison Wing, Guy's and St Thomas Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Steven DeeksDepartment of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA, 94110, USA.
Jill HorowitzLaboratory of Molecular Immunology, The Rockefeller University, New York, USA.
Michel C NussenzweigLaboratory of Molecular Immunology, The Rockefeller University, New York, USA.
Marina CaskeyLaboratory of Molecular Immunology, The Rockefeller University, New York, USA.
John Frater *Peter Medawar Building for Pathogen Research, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Sarah Fidler *Department of Infectious Disease, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Imperial College London · GBUniversity of Oxford · GBRockefeller University · USImperial College Healthcare NHS Trust · GBKing's College London · GBLondon Centre for Neglected Tropical Disease Research · GBNIHR Imperial Biomedical Research Centre · GBSt Thomas' Hospital · GBUniversity of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation #OPP1210792Medical Research Council MR/L00528X/1Medical Research Council MR/L006588/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAntiretroviral therapy (ART) has led to dramatic improvements in survival for people living with HIV, but is unable to cure infection, or induce viral control off therapy. Designing intervention trials with novel agents with the potential to confer a period of HIV remission without ART remains a key scientific and community goal. We detail the rationale, design, and outcomes of a randomised, placebo-controlled trial of two HIV-specific long-acting broadly neutralising antibodies (bNAbs): 3BNC117-LS and 10-1074-LS, which target CD4 binding site and V3 loop respectively, on post-treatment viral control.

methodsRIO is a randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blinded prospective phase II study. Eligible individuals will have started ART within 3 months of primary HIV infection and have viral sequences that appear to be sensitive to both bNAbs. It will randomise 72 eligible participants 1:1 to the following arms via a two-stage design. In Stage 1, arm A participants are given dual long-acting (LS-variants) bNAbs infusions, followed by intensively monitored Analytical Treatment Interruption (ATI) (n = 36); in arm B, participants receive placebo infusions followed by ATI. The primary endpoint will be time to viral rebound within 36 weeks after ATI. Upon viral rebound, the participant and researcher are unblinded. Participants in arm A recommence ART and complete the study. Participants in arm B are invited to restart ART and enroll into Stage 2 where they will receive open-label LS bNAbs, followed by a second ATI 24 weeks after. Secondary and exploratory endpoints include adverse events, time to undetectable viraemia after restarting ART, immunological markers, HIV proviral DNA, serum bNAb concentrations in blood, bNAb resistance at viral rebound, and quality of life measures. DISCUSSION: The two-stage design was determined in collaboration with community involvement. This design allows all participants the option to receive bNAbs. It also tests the hypothesis that bNAbs may drive sustained HIV control beyond the duration of detectable bNAb concentrations. Community representatives were involved at all stages. This included the two-stage design, discussion on the criteria to restart ART, frequency of monitoring visits off ART, and reducing the risk of onward transmission to HIV-negative partners. It also included responding to the challenges of COVID-19.

trial registrationThe protocol is registered on Clinical. TRIALS: gov and EudraCT and has approval from UK Ethics and MHRA.

Indexed as

COVID-19HIV-1HIV InfectionsBroadly Neutralizing AntibodiesClinical Trials, Phase II as TopicCommunity ParticipationHIV AntibodiesHumansProspective StudiesQuality of LifeRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSARS-CoV-2Treatment OutcomeBroadly Neutralizing AntibodiesHIV AntibodiesAntiretroviral therapyBroadly neutralising antibodiesHIVPrimary infectionT cell ImmunityVirological remission

Identifiers

PMID35382844
PMCPMC8981886
OpenAlexW4226106896

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.