Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35382825›Full record

SynthesisThe international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity2022

School-related sedentary behaviours and indicators of health and well-being among children and youth: a systematic review.

Nicholas Kuzik, Bruno G G da Costa, Yeongho Hwang, Simone J J M Verswijveren, Scott Rollo, Mark S Tremblay, Stacey Bélanger, Valerie Carson, Melanie Davis, Susan Hornby and 7 more

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Nicholas KuzikHealthy Active Living and Obesity Research Group, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada. nkuzik@cheo.on.ca.ORCID 0000-0002-5259-861X
Bruno G G da CostaSchool of Physical & Health Education, Nipissing University, North Bay, Canada.
Yeongho HwangFaculty of Kinesiology, Sport, and Recreation, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
Simone J J M VerswijverenInstitute for Physical Activity and Nutrition, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia.
Scott RolloHealthy Active Living and Obesity Research Group, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada.
Mark S TremblayHealthy Active Living and Obesity Research Group, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada.
Stacey BélangerDépartement de Pédiatrie, Faculté de Médicine, Université de Montréal and CHU Sainte Justine, CIRENE (Centre Intégré du Réseau en Neurodéveloppement de L'Enfant), Montréal, Quebec, Canada.
Valerie CarsonFaculty of Kinesiology, Sport, and Recreation, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
Melanie DavisPhysical and Health Education (PHE) Canada, Ottawa, Canada.
Susan HornbyPan-Canadian Joint Consortium for School Health (JCSH), Summerside, Canada.
Wendy Yajun HuangDepartment of Sport, Physical Education and Health, Hong Kong Baptist University, Hong Kong, China.
Barbi LawSchool of Physical & Health Education, Nipissing University, North Bay, Canada.
Jo SalmonInstitute for Physical Activity and Nutrition, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia.
Jennifer R TomasoneSchool of Kinesiology and Health Studies, Queen's University, Kingston, Canada.
Lucy-Joy WachiraPhysical Education, Exercise and Sports Science, Kenyatta University, Nairobi, Kenya.
Katrien WijndaeleMRC Epidemiology Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Travis J SaundersDepartment of Applied Human Sciences, University of Prince Edward Island, Charlottetown, Canada.

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_UU_00006/4
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe purpose of this systematic review was to examine the associations between school-related sedentary behaviours and indicators of health and well-being in children and youth (~ 5-18 years) attending school.

methodsThis review was conducted to inform the development of School-Related Sedentary Behaviour Recommendations. Peer-reviewed, published, or in-press articles in English were included. Reviews, meta-analyses, and case studies were excluded; all other study designs were eligible. Further, articles had to meet the a priori study criteria for population, intervention, comparator (PROSPERO ID: CRD42021227600). Embase, MEDLINE® ALL, and PsycINFO were searched. Risk of bias was assessed for individual experimental studies using the Cochrane risk of bias assessment tool, and in observational studies based on the GRADE framework and in line with previous systematic reviews examining sedentary behaviours in children. Overall quality of evidence was assessed using the GRADE framework for each outcome category and study design. Results were synthesized narratively, grouped by study design and outcome category. Further, several high-level summaries were conducted to help interpret results.

resultsEvidence was synthesized from 116 reports, including 1,385,038 participants and 1173 extracted associations. More school-related sedentary behaviour was favourably associated with nearly one-third of extracted associations for cognitive (33%) and social-emotional (32%) indicators (e.g., less anxiety), but unfavourably associated with other movement behaviours (e.g., less physical activity) (35%). Active lessons were favourable (72%), compared to more school-related sedentary behaviours, when examining associations for all health and well-being indicators. More homework was favourable across all health and well-being indicators in 4% of extracted associations for primary school children, and 25% of extracted associations for secondary school children. However, ≥2 h/day of homework appeared to be unfavourable for health and well-being. Limitations for synthesized studies included generally low quality of evidence and a lack of studies in South American, African, or low-middle income countries.

conclusionsFindings can help inform policy makers, schools, and teachers, regarding the amount of homework assigned and the introduction of active lessons into the classroom to enhance health and well-being of children. More research is needed examining school-related sedentary behaviours and indicators of health and well-being in low- and middle-income countries.

Indexed as

ExerciseSedentary BehaviorAdolescentChildHumansSchoolsAdolescentChildrenSchoolSedentary BehaviourSystematic ReviewYouth

Identifiers

PMID35382825
PMCPMC8979786

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.