Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35382639›Full record

ArticleWorkplace health & safety2022

Workplace Wellness Program Interest and Barriers Among Workers With Work-Related Permanent Impairments.

Jeanne M Sears, Amy T Edmonds, Peggy A Hannon, Beryl A Schulman, Deborah Fulton-Kehoe

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Workplace health & safety, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jeanne M SearsDepartment of Health Systems and Population Health, University of Washington, Seattle.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7325-1279
Amy T EdmondsDepartment of Health Systems and Population Health, University of Washington, Seattle.
Peggy A HannonDepartment of Health Systems and Population Health, University of Washington, Seattle.
Beryl A SchulmanDepartment of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle.
Deborah Fulton-KehoeDepartment of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle.

Funding

University of Washington Education and Research CenterT42OH008433 · OH · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI SIMPSON, CHRISTOPHER D · 2005 to 2024
$29.4M
Keys to Re-Injury Prevention and Sustained Return-to-Work for Disabled WorkersR21OH011355 · OH · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI SEARS, JEANNE M. · 2018 to 2019
$427k
ACL HHS R21OH011355ACL HHS T42OH008433NIOSH CDC HHS R21 OH011355NIOSH CDC HHS T42 OH008433
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNearly half of U.S. workers have access to workplace wellness programs (WWPs), 58% of workers with access participate. The aim of this study was to assess interest in WWP participation and identify reasons for lack of interest among workers with work-related permanent impairments-a population at elevated risk of adverse health outcomes.

methodsWorkers who returned to work after a work-related permanent impairment were interviewed 11 to 15 months after workers' compensation claim closure. Qualitative content analysis methods were used to code open-ended responses.

findingsOf 560 respondents, 51.4% expressed interest in WWP participation. Numerous adverse health and economic characteristics were associated with WWP interest, for example, interest was expressed by 63.3% of workers reporting fair/poor health status versus 47.1% reporting good/excellent; 56.9% of workers reporting moderate/severe pain versus 41.4% reporting mild/no pain; 64.7% of workers without health insurance versus 50.1% with health insurance; 69.0% of workers reporting depression versus 47.2% without depression; 70.4% of workers reporting obesity versus 48.0% without obesity; and 63.2% of workers often worried about expenses versus 46.9% reporting sometimes/never worried. Specific participation barriers were described by 34.2% of the 272 workers who were not interested. CONCLUSIONS/APPLICATIONS TO PRACTICE: A majority of workers with work-related permanent impairments-particularly those with adverse health and economic characteristics-were interested in WWPs. Many workers who reported no interest cited participation barriers. Further research is needed to determine whether addressing such barriers would enhance equitable access. Those undertaking WWP planning, implementation, and outreach should ensure that WWPs are inclusive and serve workers with disabilities.

Indexed as

Persons with DisabilitiesWorkplaceHealth PromotionHumansObesityWorkers' Compensationaccesshealth equityoccupational injurieswork disabilityworkplace health promotion

Identifiers

PMID35382639
PMCPMC9339535

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.