Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35382545›Full record

ReviewEngineering in life sciences2022

Aptasensors versus immunosensors-Which will prevail?

Sofia Arshavsky-Graham, Christopher Heuer, Xin Jiang, Ester Segal

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Engineering in life sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. In silico development of RNA aptamer candidates against thyroid receptor.Journal of computer-aided molecular design · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Green Fluorescent Protein SELEX: Immobilization Chemistry and His-Tag Epitope Bias.Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) · 2025
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sofia Arshavsky-GrahamFaculty of Biotechnology and Food Engineering Technion - Israel Institute of Technology Haifa Israel.
Christopher HeuerFaculty of Biotechnology and Food Engineering Technion - Israel Institute of Technology Haifa Israel.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3694-0008
Xin JiangFaculty of Biotechnology and Food Engineering Technion - Israel Institute of Technology Haifa Israel.
Ester SegalFaculty of Biotechnology and Food Engineering Technion - Israel Institute of Technology Haifa Israel.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9472-754X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since the invention of the first biosensors 70 years ago, they have turned into valuable and versatile tools for various applications, ranging from disease diagnosis to environmental monitoring. Traditionally, antibodies have been employed as the capture probes in most biosensors, owing to their innate ability to bind their target with high affinity and specificity, and are still considered as the gold standard. Yet, the resulting immunosensors often suffer from considerable limitations, which are mainly ascribed to the antibody size, conjugation chemistry, stability, and costs. Over the past decade, aptamers have emerged as promising alternative capture probes presenting some advantages over existing constraints of immunosensors, as well as new biosensing concepts. Herein, we review the employment of antibodies and aptamers as capture probes in biosensing platforms, addressing the main aspects of biosensor design and mechanism. We also aim to compare both capture probe classes from theoretical and experimental perspectives. Yet, we highlight that such comparisons are not straightforward, and these two families of capture probes should not be necessarily perceived as competing but rather as complementary. We, thus, elaborate on their combined use in hybrid biosensing schemes benefiting from the advantages of each biorecognition element.

Indexed as

antibodyantibody‐aptamer hybridaptamerbiosensorscapture probes

Identifiers

PMID35382545
PMCPMC8961048

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.