Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35382508›Full record

ArticleJournal of scleroderma and related disorders2019

The Scleroderma Research Topics Survey for patients and health care professionals: A Scleroderma Patient-centered Intervention Network Project.

Lydia Tao, Claire Fedoruk, Kimberly A Turner, Julie Cumin, Marie-Eve Carrier, Andrea Carboni-Jiménez, Mia R Pépin, Linda Kwakkenbos, Brett D Thombs, SPIN Patient Advisory Board

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of scleroderma and related disorders, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Lydia TaoLady Davis Institute, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Claire FedorukLady Davis Institute, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Kimberly A TurnerLady Davis Institute, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Julie CuminLady Davis Institute, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Marie-Eve CarrierLady Davis Institute, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Andrea Carboni-JiménezLady Davis Institute, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Mia R PépinLady Davis Institute, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Linda KwakkenbosBehavioural Science Institute, Department of Clinical Psychology, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Brett D ThombsLady Davis Institute, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5644-8432
SPIN Patient Advisory Board
Jewish General Hospital · CARadboud University Nijmegen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Involving patients and health care professionals in research has been shown to be a useful strategy to generate program development ideas and establish research priorities. Online surveys can be used to identify patient research priorities. The Scleroderma Patient-centered Intervention Network is an international collaboration dedicated to researching problems important to people with scleroderma and developing, testing, and disseminating educational, self-management, rehabilitation, and psychological tools to support coping within the disease. The objectives of the Scleroderma Patient-centered Intervention Network Scleroderma Research Topics Survey were to (1) obtain input on online programs that Scleroderma Patient-centered Intervention Network could develop, (2) identify research topics important to members of the scleroderma community that could be addressed via the Scleroderma Patient-centered Intervention Network Cohort, and (3) identify potentially understudied groups. Eligible survey respondents included individuals with scleroderma and their caregivers, health care professionals, and patient organization representatives. Responses were evaluated separately for online programs, possible research questions, and understudied groups. In each category, thematic analysis was used to group responses into themes. A total of 125 participants (100 patients, 24 health care professionals, and 1 caregiver) completed the survey, and responses from patients and health care professionals were reported. For online programs, frequent recommendations included Interactive Platforms to facilitate communication between patients, as well as interventions targeting physical activity, and emotions and stress. Common responses for possible research questions were related to calcinosis, accessing health care, and quality of life. The most common suggestions for understudied groups were young patients, minority patients, and patients with calcinosis. Research topic suggestions provided in the survey will inform Scleroderma Patient-centered Intervention Network priorities and can be considered by other researchers.

Indexed as

health care professionalspatientsSclerodermasurveysystemic sclerosis

Identifiers

PMID35382508
PMCPMC8922562
OpenAlexW2940871585

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.