ReviewChemical science2022
Bridging electrocatalyst and cocatalyst studies for solar hydrogen production
Review in Chemical science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- NHAdvanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2026Article
- Boron-Induced Electronic Modulation and Nanocrystal Fragmentation Synergistically Boost Photocatalytic Water Oxidation in Ionic Carbon Nitrides.ACS catalysis · 2025Article
- A Mind Map to Address the Next Generation of Artificial Photosynthesis Experiments.Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2025Article
- Phase-Controlled Synthesis of Ru Supported on Carbon Nitride and the Application in Photocatalytic HMaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Boosting the Quantum Efficiency of Ionic Carbon Nitrides in Photocatalytic HAdvanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2024Article
- Solar-Driven Sustainability: III-V Semiconductor for Green Energy Production Technologies.Nano-micro letters · 2024Review
- An integrated n-Si/BiVOChemical science · 2023Article
- Metal-Organic Frameworks as Photocatalysts for Solar-Driven Overall Water Splitting.Chemical reviews · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Solar-driven water-splitting has been considered as a promising technology for large-scale generation of sustainable energy for succeeding generations. Recent intensive efforts have led to the discovery of advanced multi-element-compound water-splitting electrocatalysts with very small overpotentials in anticipation of their application to solar cell-assisted water electrolysis. Although photocatalytic and photoelectrochemical water-splitting systems are more attractive approaches for scaling up without much technical complexity and high investment costs, improving their efficiencies remains a huge challenge. Hybridizing photocatalysts or photoelectrodes with cocatalysts has been an effective scheme to enhance their overall solar energy conversion efficiencies. However, direct integration of highly-active electrocatalysts as cocatalysts introduces critical factors that require careful consideration. These additional requirements limit the design principle for cocatalysts compared with electrocatalysts, decelerating development of cocatalyst materials. This perspective first summarizes the recent advances in electrocatalyst materials and the effective strategies to assemble cocatalyst/photoactive semiconductor composites, and further discusses the core principles and tools that hold the key in designing advanced cocatalysts and generating a deeper understanding on how to further push the limits of water-splitting efficiency.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.