Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35382362›Full record

ArticleArchives of rheumatology2021

Patient perspectives on biological treatments for inflammatory arthritis: A multi-center study in Korea.

In Ah Choi, Ji Hyoun Kim, Sung Hae Chang, Ran Song, You-Jung Ha, Hye Won Kim, Jeong Seok Lee, Byoongyong Choi, Yoon-Jeong Oh, Ki Won Moon

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of rheumatology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

In Ah ChoiDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Chungbuk National University Hospital, Cheongju, South Korea.
Ji Hyoun KimDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Chungbuk National University Hospital, Cheongju, South Korea.
Sung Hae ChangDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Soonchunhyang University Hospital, Cheonan, South Korea.
Ran SongDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Kyung Hee University, Seoul, South Korea.
You-Jung HaDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, South Korea.
Hye Won KimDepartment of Internal Medicine, Hospital Medicine Center, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, South Korea.
Jeong Seok LeeKorea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Graduate School of Medical Science and Engineering, Daejeon, South Korea.
Byoongyong ChoiDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Seoul Metropolitan Seoul Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea.
Yoon-Jeong OhDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Kangwon National University School of Medicine, Chuncheon, South Korea.
Ki Won MoonDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Kangwon National University School of Medicine, Chuncheon, South Korea.
Chungbuk National University Hospital · KRKangwon National University · KRSeoul National University Bundang Hospital · KRKorea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology · KRKyung Hee University · KRSoonchunhyang University Hospital Seoul · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the patient's perception of the use of biological disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) and provide a basis for physicians to understand the patient's perspective. Patients and methods: Between December 2018 and June 2019, a total of 307 patients (162 males, 145 females; mean age: 48 years; range, 18 to 81 years) were included in this investigator-initiated, multi-center, observational, and cross-sectional study in six rheumatology centers. We asked patients using bDMARDs to treat rheumatoid arthritis (RA) or ankylosing spondylitis (AS) to complete a questionnaire regarding major considerations and satisfaction with bDMARDs, preferred administration route, knowledge about bDMARDs, experiences of adverse events, non-adherence, and expectations of their healthcare provider. The satisfaction of physician and clinical information on the patient's disease and treatment were also collected. Results: Of the patients, 139 had RA and 168 had AS. Median disease duration was six years in RA and five years in AS. A total of 80.1% of the patients and 77.1% of the physicians indicated being satisfied or very satisfied with the therapeutic effect of the current bDMARD. Most patients were open to intravenous or subcutaneous injection, with the most preferred route of administration being subcutaneous (41.3%), followed by intravenous (32.0%), and oral (26.7%). The patients considered therapeutic effect to be more important than cost or convenience while choosing a bDMARD (69.3%), and most were willing to be educated about therapeutic effects (46.1%). Only 35.2% of the patients reported well and/or very well knowledge about the therapeutic effects, side effects, and administration methods of their current bDMARD, and 86.6% cited their physician as the primary source of information about biological treatment. Conclusion: Patients value therapeutic effect more than cost or convenience while selecting a bDMARD, and consider their physicians to be the primary information source. Therefore, it is important for physicians to provide appropriate education and encourage patients to cooperate actively with treatment.

Indexed as

Ankylosing spondylitisbiological agentKoreapatient educationrheumatoid arthriti

Identifiers

PMID35382362
PMCPMC8957778
OpenAlexW3191987655

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.