Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35382349›Full record

ReviewResearch and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis2022

Coagulation in pediatric extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: A systematic review of studies shows lack of standardized reporting.

Joppe Drop, Suelyn Van Den Helm, Paul Monagle, Enno Wildschut, Matthijs de Hoog, Sabrina T G Gunput, Fiona Newall, Heidi J Dalton, Graeme MacLaren, Vera Ignjatovic and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Hemostatic Outcome Definitions in Pediatric Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: Challenges in Cohorts From Rotterdam (2019-2023) and Melbourne (2016-2022).Pediatric critical care medicine : a journal of the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies · 2025
    Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Joppe DropPediatric Hematology Erasmus University Medical Center - Sophia Children's Hospital Rotterdam The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6898-1595
Suelyn Van Den HelmHematology Murdoch Children's Research Institute Melbourne Victoria Australia.
Paul MonagleHematology Murdoch Children's Research Institute Melbourne Victoria Australia.
Enno WildschutPediatric Intensive Care Erasmus University Medical Center - Sophia Children's Hospital Rotterdam The Netherlands.
Matthijs de HoogPediatric Intensive Care Erasmus University Medical Center - Sophia Children's Hospital Rotterdam The Netherlands.
Sabrina T G GunputMedical Library Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam The Netherlands.
Fiona NewallHematology Murdoch Children's Research Institute Melbourne Victoria Australia.
Heidi J DaltonDepartment of Pediatrics INOVA Heart and Vascular Institute Falls Church Virginia USA.
Graeme MacLarenHematology Murdoch Children's Research Institute Melbourne Victoria Australia.
Vera IgnjatovicHematology Murdoch Children's Research Institute Melbourne Victoria Australia.
C Heleen van OmmenPediatric Hematology Erasmus University Medical Center - Sophia Children's Hospital Rotterdam The Netherlands.
Erasmus MC · NLRoyal Children's Hospital · AUMurdoch Children's Research Institute · AUThe University of Melbourne · AUVirginia Commonwealth University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) involves complex coagulation management and frequent hemostatic complications. ECMO practice between centers is variable. To compare results between coagulation studies, standardized definitions and clear documentation of ECMO practice is essential. We assessed how study population, outcome definitions, and ECMO-, coagulation-, and transfusion-related parameters were described in pediatric ECMO studies. Data sources: Embase, Medline, Web of Science, Cochrane Library and Google Scholar. Study selection: English original studies of pediatric ECMO patients describing hemostatic tests or outcome. Data extraction: Eligibility was assessed following PRISMA guidelines. Study population, outcome and ECMO-, coagulation, and transfusion parameters were summarized. Data synthesis: A total of 107 of 1312 records were included. Study population parameters most frequently included (gestational) age (79%), gender (60%), and (birth) weight (59%). Outcomes, including definitions of bleeding (29%), thrombosis (15%), and survival (43%), were described using various definitions. Description of pump type, oxygenator and cannulation mode occurred in 49%, 45%, and 36% of studies, respectively. The main coagulation test (53%), its reference ranges (49%), and frequency of testing (24%) were the most prevalent reported coagulation parameters. The transfusion thresholds for platelets, red blood cells, and fibrinogen were described in 27%, 18%, and 18% of studies, respectively. Conclusions: This systematic review demonstrates a widespread lack of detail or standardization of several parameters in coagulation research of pediatric ECMO patients. We suggest several parameters that might be included in future coagulation studies. We encourage the ECMO community to adopt and refine this list of parameters and to use standardized definitions in future research.

Indexed as

blood coagulationblood coagulation testcritical care outcomesextracorporeal membrane oxygenationpediatricsreference values

Identifiers

PMID35382349
PMCPMC8961047
OpenAlexW4221101238

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.