ReviewCureus2022
Cardioprotective Role of Estrogen in Takotsubo Cardiomyopathy.
Review in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Metformin as a potential therapeutic agent in broken heart syndrome: Targeting AMPK-dependent cardio-protection and microvascular function.Molecular biology reports · 2026Review
- Takotsubo Syndrome After Emergency Cesarean Delivery in Twin Pregnancy: A Rare Cause of Acute Postpartum Heart Failure.Case reports in obstetrics and gynecology · 2026Article
- The Bidirectionality of Psychosocial Stress and Cardiovascular Disease Risk in Women; Recognition and Strategies for Management.Current atherosclerosis reports · 2025Review
- Recommendations for the Application of Sex and Gender Medicine in Preclinical, Epidemiological and Clinical Research.Journal of personalized medicine · 2024Review
- Takotsubo Syndrome: Differences between Peripartum Period and General Population.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Takotsubo cardiomyopathy (TC) is a rare, reversible cause of left ventricular wall motion abnormality (LVWMA) that mimics the presentation of acute myocardial infarction (AMI). TC is usually preceded by an emotional or physical stressor and appears to be more common in postmenopausal women. Various pathophysiological hypotheses of TC have been proposed, but the exact mechanism of action remains elusive. Elevated levels of catecholamines leading to cardiac dysfunction are the most prevalent hypothesis. The protective role of estrogen in the development of cardiomyopathies has been studied extensively. International Takotsubo Diagnostic Criteria (InterTAK) and Mayo clinic diagnostic criteria both have the stipulation stating prevalence of TC is higher in postmenopausal women which hints towards the protective role of estrogen in the development of TC. To review the protective role of estrogen in the mechanism of this novel pathology, we searched Pubmed and Google scholar for the relevant articles by using keywords such as: "takotsubo cardiomyopathy", "apical ballooning", "broken heart syndrome", "stress cardiomyopathy", "left ventricle wall motion abnormality", "estrogen", "estradiol" and "sex hormones". Our research revealed that although the prevalence of TC is greater in postmenopausal women as compared to men, the prognosis is worse in men. It also revealed the involvement of multiple cellular pathways under the influence of estrogen that could explain the cardioprotective effect of estrogen. Most of the articles found were based on animal studies, thus, there is an emphasis on future human studies. However, we strongly suggest evaluating estrogen levels as part of the initial workup for any patient presenting with signs and symptoms of cardiac pathology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.