ReviewJournal of scleroderma and related disorders2021
Is there still a role for cyclophosphamide in the treatment of systemic sclerosis?
Review in Journal of scleroderma and related disorders, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- First-Line Tocilizumab Monotherapy for Juvenile Systemic Sclerosis With Interstitial Lung Disease: A Case Report.Case reports in rheumatology · 2026Article
- Anti-SRP Antibodies and Myocarditis in Systemic Sclerosis Overlap Syndrome with Immune-Mediated Necrotizing Myositis (IMNM).Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2024Review
- The Role of Macrophages in Connective Tissue Disease-Associated Interstitial Lung Disease: Focusing on Molecular Mechanisms and Potential Treatment Strategies.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Immunosuppression use in early systemic sclerosis may be increasing over time.Journal of scleroderma and related disorders · 2022Article
- Diagnosis and Management of Cutaneous Manifestations of Autoimmune Connective Tissue Diseases.Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology · 2022Review
- The target on B cells in Systemic Sclerosis: a "midsummer dream" to extinguish inflammation and prevent early disease progression to fibrosis.Clinical rheumatology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cyclophosphamide has been the cornerstone of treatment of systemic sclerosis for a long time and is the first-choice therapy for treating systemic sclerosis-associated interstitial lung disease according to the European League Against Rheumatism recommendations on treatment of systemic sclerosis. However, new therapeutic options are emerging, and treatment with cyclophosphamide is hampered by its toxicity and restricted possible treatment duration. This review has a focus on the evidence of efficacy of cyclophosphamide in different aspects of systemic sclerosis and its organ involvements, reviews its toxicity, and will answer the question whether there is still a role for cyclophosphamide in the treatment of systemic sclerosis, taking the evidence and current therapeutic options into account.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.