ArticleThe Pan African medical journal2022
Speciation and antifungal susceptibility of
Article in The Pan African medical journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Candida Drug Resistance in Patients With Diabetic Foot Ulcers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.International wound journal · 2026Pooled it
- Fungal detection, diagnostic approaches, and antifungal susceptibility in diabetic foot ulcers: a systematic review of recent evidence.Frontiers in fungal biology · 2026Pooled it
- Detection of Candida Species in Genitourinary Tract among Immunocompromised Patients Attending Rural Teaching Hospital.Annals of African medicine · 2026Article
- A Cross-Sectional Study to DetermineBioMed research international · 2026Article
- Antimicrobial Resistance in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Comprehensive Landscape Review.The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2025Review
- Article
- Clinic-mycological spectrum ofCurrent medical mycology · 2023Article
- A study of the association between virulence factors and antifungal susceptibility profile ofJournal of family medicine and primary care · 2023Article
- Identification of the rare yeast Cutaneotrichosporon (Trichosporon) debeurmannianum from diabetic foot infection.Journal of clinical laboratory analysis · 2022Article
- Current research on fungi in chronic wounds.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: diabetic foot ulcer is the leading cause of hospital admissions, lower limb amputation and death among diabetic patients. Little information is available on fungal isolation in diabetic foot ulcer patients, especially in sub-Saharan Africa. This study aimed to describe Candida species infecting diabetic foot ulcers in patients receiving clinical care at Kenyatta National Hospital and assess their antifungal susceptibility profile. Methods: this was a cross-sectional study carried out at Kenyatta National Hospital among adult diabetic foot ulcer patients over a three-month period. Species identification of Candida was performed using VITEK - 2 System and further confirmed by Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption Ionization-Time of Flight Mass Spectrometry. Antifungal susceptibility testing was determined using VITEK-2 System. Data were analysed using WHONET and SPSS. Results: among the 152 study patients recruited, 98% (n=149) had type 2 diabetes. Sixty one percent of the participants were male. The mean age of the study participants was 50.7 years (SD 12.9). A total of 36 Candida species were isolated, of which 75% (n=27) were Candida albicans. Candida lusitaniae (8%, n=3) and C. dubliniensis (5%, n=2) were the predominant non-albicans Candida species. The overall prevalence of diabetic foot ulcer candidiasis was 20% (n=31). C. albicans isolates (26%) were resistant to caspofungin, fluconazole, micafungin, and voriconazole but highly susceptible to amphotericin B and flucytosine (81-96%). Non-albicans Candida species isolated were susceptible (90-100%) to a majority of the antifungal agents tested. Conclusion: Candida albicans was the predominant species isolated and showed low resistance rates to the commonly administered antifungal agents. There is need to include fungal diagnosis in the investigation of diabetic foot ulcer infection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.