Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35382010›Full record

SynthesisPeerJ2022

Effectiveness of digital mental health interventions for university students: an umbrella review.

Sophia Harith, Insa Backhaus, Najihah Mohbin, Huyen Thi Ngo, Selina Khoo

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PeerJ, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06773468 (Evaluating Knowledge Mobilization for Stress Management in University Students), which is not on this map. Cited by 36 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
12.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06773468 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Evaluating Knowledge Mobilization for Stress Management in University Students

TypeinterventionalSponsorMcGill UniversityRan2023 to 2024Enrolled313ConditionsStress, Coping, Digital Intervention, University StudentsArmsstress management
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 93 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Clustering the Depression Prevalence in Indonesia Provinces through Natural Breaks Jenks Method.Clinical practice and epidemiology in mental health : CP & EMH · 2025
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Sophia HarithCentre for Sport and Exercise Sciences, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Insa BackhausInstitute of Medical Sociology, Centre for Health and Society, Medical Faculty, Heinrich Heine University, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Najihah MohbinHealth Promotion Unit, Pekan District Health Office, Pekan, Pahang, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0001-6325-5631
Huyen Thi NgoFaculty of Library and Information Science, University of Social Sciences and Humanities/Vietnam National University, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
Selina KhooCentre for Sport and Exercise Sciences, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
University of Malaya · MYHeinrich Heine University Düsseldorf · DEVietnam National University Ho Chi Minh City · VN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Poor mental health among university students remains a pressing public health issue. Over the past few years, digital health interventions have been developed and considered promising in increasing psychological wellbeing among university students. Therefore, this umbrella review aims to synthesize evidence on digital health interventions targeting university students and to evaluate their effectiveness. Methods: A systematic literature search was performed in April 2021 searching PubMed, Psychology and Behavioural Science Collection, Web of Science, ERIC, and Scopus for systematic reviews and meta-analyses on digital mental health interventions targeting university students. The review protocol was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews PROSPERO [CRD42021234773]. Results: The initital literature search resulted in 806 records of which seven remained after duplicates were removed and evaluated against the inclusion criteria. Effectiveness was reported and categorized into the following six delivery types: (a) web-based, online/computer-delivered interventions (b) computer-based Cognitive Behavior Therapy (CBT), (c) mobile applications and short message service (d) virtual reality interventions (e) skills training (f) relaxation and exposure-based therapy. Results indicated web-based online/computer delivered-interventions were effective or at least partially effective at decressing depression, anxiety, stress and eating disorder symptoms. This was similar for skills-training interventions, CBT-based intervention and mobile applications. However, digital mental health interventions using virtual reality and relaxation, exposure-based therapy was inconclusive. Due to the variation in study settings and inconsistencies in reporting, effectiveness was greatly dependent on the delivery format, targeted mental health problem and targeted purpose group. Conclusion: The findings provide evidence for the beneficial effect of digital mental health interventions for university students. However, this review calls for a more systematic approach in testing and reporting the effectiveness of digital mental health interventions.

Indexed as

Cognitive Behavioral TherapyMental HealthHumansStudentsSystematic Reviews as TopicUniversitiesDigital healthDigital interventionMental healthmHealthUndergraduateUniversity studentsYoung people

Identifiers

PMID35382010
PMCPMC8977068
OpenAlexW4221021975

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.