Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35381975›Full record

ArticleDermatology and therapy2022

Economic Burden and Healthcare Resource Use of Alopecia Areata in an Insured Population in the USA.

Arash Mostaghimi, Jason Xenakis, Aster Meche, Timothy W Smith, David Gruben, Vanja Sikirica

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Dermatology and therapy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Alopecia Areata: Current Treatments and New Directions.American journal of clinical dermatology · 2023
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Healthcare Utilization and Costs Among US Adolescents With Alopecia Areata.Journal of health economics and outcomes research · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Arash MostaghimiDepartment of Dermatology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 221 Longwood Ave, Boston, MA, 02115, USA. amostaghimi@bwh.harvard.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6084-5617
Jason XenakisPfizer Inc, New York, NY, USA.
Aster MechePfizer Inc, New York, NY, USA.
Timothy W SmithPfizer Inc, New York, NY, USA.
David GrubenPfizer Inc, Groton, CT, USA.
Vanja SikiricaPfizer Inc, Collegeville, PA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionComparative data on the economic burden of alopecia areata relative to the general population are limited. The objective of this retrospective database analysis was to evaluate healthcare resource utilization and direct medical costs among patients with alopecia areata from the US payer perspective compared with matched controls.

methodsValidated billing codes were used to identify patients with alopecia areata from the IQVIA PharMetrics Plus (2016-2018) who had continuous pharmacy and medical enrollment for 365 days both before (baseline period) and after (evaluation period) the index date. Demographic and clinical characteristics were characterized, and baseline comorbidities were assessed with the Quan Charlson Comorbidity Index.

resultsUsing the exact matching feature from Instant Health Data, 14,340 patients with alopecia areata were matched with 42,998 control patients aged ≥ 12 years. Patients with alopecia areata had higher healthcare resource utilization and adjusted total all-cause mean medical costs versus matched controls ($8557 versus $6416; p < 0.0001), because of higher inpatient costs, emergency department visits, ambulatory visits, number of prescriptions and prescription costs, and other costs such as durable medical equipment and home healthcare. The number of inpatient visits did not significantly differ between the two groups. Mean ambulatory costs were $3640 for patients with alopecia areata and $2062 for controls, and mean pharmacy costs were $3287 and $1843, respectively (p < 0.0001 for both). Pharmacy costs related to immunologic agents represented 50.0% of the total difference in pharmacy spending between patients with alopecia areata and controls. Surgery on the integumentary system accounted for 9.5% of the total difference in ambulatory costs.

conclusionAlopecia areata is associated with significant incremental healthcare resource utilization and costs relative to matched controls due to increased spending in areas such as surgical procedures and psychological and pharmacological interventions. Costs are primarily driven by ambulatory and pharmacy spending.

Indexed as

Alopecia areataAutoimmuneEconomic burdenHealthcare costsHealthcare resource utilization

Identifiers

PMID35381975
PMCPMC9021349

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.