Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35381974›Full record

ReviewCurrent reviews in musculoskeletal medicine2022

Rehabilitation After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury: Review of Current Literature and Recommendations.

Sarah M Jenkins, Alvarho Guzman, Brandon B Gardner, Stewart A Bryant, Shane Rayos Del Sol, Patrick McGahan, James Chen

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 56 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
56citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

56 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Comparing kinematic and kinetic demands on the knee joint during selected physiotherapy exercises and activities of daily living.Technology and health care : official journal of the European Society for Engineering and Medicine · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Return To Sport Following ACL Reconstruction.Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine · 2025
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sarah M JenkinsAdvanced Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine, 450 Sutter St, San Francisco, CA, 94108, USA. jenkism14@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3065-9266
Alvarho GuzmanAdvanced Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine, 450 Sutter St, San Francisco, CA, 94108, USA.
Brandon B GardnerAdvanced Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine, 450 Sutter St, San Francisco, CA, 94108, USA.
Stewart A BryantUniversity of Hawaii Orthopaedic Surgery Residency, Honolulu, HI, USA.
Shane Rayos Del SolAdvanced Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine, 450 Sutter St, San Francisco, CA, 94108, USA.
Patrick McGahanAdvanced Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine, 450 Sutter St, San Francisco, CA, 94108, USA.
James ChenAdvanced Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine, 450 Sutter St, San Francisco, CA, 94108, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewAnterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) is a common surgical procedure with an estimated 120,000 cases performed in the USA each year. Physical therapy plays a critical role in the successful recovery of both surgically and non-surgically managed patients. Interestingly, ACL rehabilitation protocols vary greatly with little consensus among practitioners. Nonetheless, there has been agreement over the last decade to shift from conservative, standardized length protocols to more accelerated, individualized protocols that vary in length and modalities based on patient-specific findings and preferences. This review summarizes the most recent trends, opinions, and modalities in ACL rehabilitation research, with a specific focus on novel methods to treat the specific psychosocial needs of ACL deficient patients. RECENT

findingsWe found that new protocols emphasize early weight bearing, open kinetic chain (OKC) exercises, and other alternative modalities such as neuromuscular electrical stimulation and blood flow restriction. We also found a recent trend toward the use of clinical milestones to determine when a patient is ready for the next phase of a "step-up" rehabilitation program. One particularly nascent topic of research is the inclusion of methods to treat the psychosocial impacts of ACL injury, recovery, and the anxiety around return to sport. Rehabilitation strategy has become increasingly patient-dependent, and the new modalities being utilized are accelerating patient recovery. Return to sport is a particularly important factor for many ACLR patients, and recovery has an important psychological component that has only recently been addressed in the literature, with positive preliminary findings.

Indexed as

ACLPhysical therapyPsychosocialReturn to sport

Identifiers

PMID35381974
PMCPMC9107547

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.