ArticleInternational ophthalmology2022
Repeatability of i.Profiler for measuring wavefront aberrations in healthy eyes.
Article in International ophthalmology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Changes of pupil parameters and visual quality after cataract surgery as well as their correlation.International journal of ophthalmology · 2026Article
- Physiological correlates and predictors of vasovagal responses following dry needling in myofascial pain syndrome: a controlled observational study.Therapeutic advances in musculoskeletal disease · 2026Article
- Functional Intermediate Vision and Pupil-Dependent Optical Behavior After Implantation of a Segmented Refractive Multifocal Intraocular Lens.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2026Article
- Comparative Assessment of Corneal Imaging Devices for Pediatric Patients: Evaluating Keratometric Measurements and Wavefront Aberrations.Journal of ophthalmic & vision research · 2025Article
- Changes in Shape Discrimination Sensitivity Under Glare Conditions After Orthokeratology in Myopic Children: A Prospective Study.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo evaluate the repeatability of wavefront aberration measurements and the correlation between corneal aberration and pupil size in normal eyes using a wavefront-based autorefractor (i.Profiler
methodsA prospective cross-sectional study. Wavefront aberrations, including spherical aberration (SA) (Z
resultsA total of 96 healthy young volunteers were enrolled. Corneal and ocular higher-order aberrations (HOA) measured by i.Profiler showed S
conclusionsThe measurements of wavefront aberrations by i.Profiler are highly repeatable. Corneal HOA was significantly dependent on pupil size. SA was the most influential aberration for visual quality in this study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
35381898What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.