Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35381886›Full record

ArticleArchives of microbiology2022

Evaluation of antibiofilm potential of four-domain α-amylase from Streptomyces griseus against exopolysaccharides (EPS) of bacterial pathogens using Danio rerio.

Selvaraj Alagu Lakshmi, Rajaiah Alexpandi, Raja Mohamed Beema Shafreen, Kannapiran Tamilmuhilan, Adimoolam Srivathsan, Thirupathi Kasthuri, Arumugam Veera Ravi, Sugathan Shiburaj, Shunmugiah Karutha Pandian

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of microbiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Biotechnology revival:Frontiers in microbiology · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. An apparent lack of synergy between degradative enzymes againstbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Selvaraj Alagu LakshmiDepartment of Biotechnology, Alagappa University, Tamil Nadu, Science Campus, Karaikudi, 630003, India.
Rajaiah Alexpandi *Department of Biotechnology, Alagappa University, Tamil Nadu, Science Campus, Karaikudi, 630003, India.
Raja Mohamed Beema Shafreen *Department of Biotechnology, Alagappa University, Tamil Nadu, Science Campus, Karaikudi, 630003, India.
Kannapiran Tamilmuhilan *Department of Biotechnology, Alagappa University, Tamil Nadu, Science Campus, Karaikudi, 630003, India.
Adimoolam Srivathsan *Department of Biotechnology, Alagappa University, Tamil Nadu, Science Campus, Karaikudi, 630003, India.
Thirupathi KasthuriDepartment of Biotechnology, Alagappa University, Tamil Nadu, Science Campus, Karaikudi, 630003, India.
Arumugam Veera RaviDepartment of Biotechnology, Alagappa University, Tamil Nadu, Science Campus, Karaikudi, 630003, India.
Sugathan ShiburajDivision of Microbiology, Jawaharlal Nehru Tropical Botanic Garden and Research Institute, Palode, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, 695562, India.
Shunmugiah Karutha PandianDepartment of Biotechnology, Alagappa University, Tamil Nadu, Science Campus, Karaikudi, 630003, India. pandiansk@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2925-0575
Alagappa University · INUniversity of Kerala · IN

Funding

department of biotechnology , ministry of science and technology BT/PR12720/COE/34/21/2015
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biofilm formation is a major issue in healthcare settings as 75% of nosocomial infection arises due to biofilm residing bacteria. Exopolysaccharides (EPS), a key component of the biofilm matrix, contribute to the persistence of cells in a complex milieu and defends greatly from exogenous stress and demolition. It has been shown to be vital for biofilm scaffold and pathogenic features. The present study was aimed to investigate the effectiveness of four domain-containing α-amylase from Streptomyces griseus (SGAmy) in disrupting the EPS of multidrug-resistant bacteria, especially methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. In vitro analysis of preformed biofilm unveiled the antibiofilm efficacy of SGAmy against MRSA (85%, p < 0.05) and P. aeruginosa (82%, p < 0.05). The total carbohydrate content in the EPS matrix of MRSA and P. aeruginosa was significantly reduced to 71.75% (p < 0.01) and 74.09% (p < 0.01), respectively. The findings inferred from in vitro analysis were further corroborated through in vivo studies using an experimental model organism, Danio rerio. Remarkably, the survival rate was extended to 88.8% (p < 0.05) and 74.2% (p < 0.05) in MRSA and P. aeruginosa infected fishes, respectively. An examination of gills, kidneys, and intestines of D. rerio organs depicted the reduced level of microbial colonization in SGAmy-treated cohorts and these findings were congruent with bacterial enumeration results.

Indexed as

Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureusStreptomyces griseusalpha-AmylasesAnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacteriaBiofilmsMicrobial Sensitivity TestsPseudomonas aeruginosaZebrafishalpha-AmylasesAnti-Bacterial AgentsBiofilm dispersalDanio rerioExopolysaccharidesFour-domain α-amylaseMRSAP. aeruginosa

Identifiers

PMID35381886
OpenAlexW4225630704

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.