Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35381622›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association2022

Qualitative analysis of cancer care experiences among rural cancer survivors and caregivers.

Kendra L Ratnapradipa, Jordan Ranta, Krishtee Napit, Lady Beverly Luma, Tamara Robinson, Danae Dinkel, Laura Schabloske, Shinobu Watanabe-Galloway

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Navigating rural challenges and promoting posttraumatic growth via expressive writing: a qualitative study among rural breast cancer survivors.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Outcomes That Matter in Gastrointestinal Cancer Care: A Focus Group Study of Patient-Centred Outcomes Identified by Patients and Care Partners.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. "The aspect of caregiving becomes incredibly complex": lived experiences of rural cancer caregiving identified through community advisory board engagement.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Rural comprehensive cancer care: Qualitative analysis of current challenges and opportunities.The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Qualitative Analysis of Colorectal Cancer Screening for African American and Hispanic Populations in Nebraska: an Application of the PRECEDE Framework.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Rural resilience during COVID-19: the lived experience of North Carolinian rural-dwelling cancer caregivers.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Kendra L RatnapradipaDepartment of Epidemiology, College of Public Health, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, USA.
Jordan RantaSarpy/Cass Health Department, Papillion, Nebraska, USA.
Krishtee NapitDepartment of Epidemiology, College of Public Health, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, USA.
Lady Beverly LumaOffice of Community Outreach and Engagement, Fred & Pamela Buffett Cancer Center, Omaha, Nebraska, USA.
Tamara RobinsonNebraska Cancer Coalition, Lincoln, Nebraska, USA.
Danae DinkelSchool of Health & Kinesiology, University of Nebraska at Omaha, Omaha, Nebraska, USA.
Laura SchabloskeNebraska Cancer Coalition, Lincoln, Nebraska, USA.
Shinobu Watanabe-GallowayDepartment of Epidemiology, College of Public Health, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, USA.

Funding

UNMC/EPPLEY CANCER CENTER SUPPORT GRANTP30CA036727 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA MEDICAL CENTER · PI James Eudy · 1985 to 2026
$55.0M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA036727
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeRural (vs urban) patients experience poorer cancer outcomes and are less likely to be engaged in cancer prevention, such as screening. As part of a community needs assessment, we explored rural cancer survivors' and caregivers' experiences, perceptions, and attitudes toward cancer care services.

methodsWe conducted 3 focus groups (N = 20) in Spring 2021 in rural Nebraska.

findingsThree patterns of cancer diagnosis were regular care/screening without noticeable symptoms, treatment for symptoms not initially identified as cancer related, and symptom self-identification. Most participants, regardless of how diagnosis was made, had positive experiences with timely referral for testing (imaging and biopsy) and specialist care. Physician interpersonal skills set the tone for patient-provider communication, which colored the perception of overall care. Participants with physicians and care teams that were perceived as "considerate," "compassionate," and "caring" had positive experiences. Participants identified specific obstacles to care, including financial barriers, transportation, and lack of support groups, as well as more general cultural barriers. Survivors and caregivers identified organization-based supports that helped them address such barriers.

conclusionsRural populations have unique perspectives about cancer care. Our results are being used by the state cancer coalition, state cancer control program, and the National Cancer Institute-designated cancer center to prioritize outreach and interventions aimed to reduce rural cancer disparities, such as revitalizing lay cancer navigator programs, conducting webinars for primary care and cancer specialty providers to discuss these findings and identify potential interventions, and collaborating with national and regional cancer support organizations to expand reach in rural communities.

Indexed as

Cancer SurvivorsNeoplasmsCaregiversFocus GroupsHumansQualitative ResearchRural PopulationSurvivorscancer carecancer preventionfocus groupqualitative analysisrural health

Identifiers

PMID35381622
PMCPMC9492624

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.