Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35381033›Full record

SynthesisPloS one2022

Safety and efficacy of colchicine in COVID-19 patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized control trials.

Farah Yasmin, Hala Najeeb, Abdul Moeed, Wardah Hassan, Mahima Khatri, Muhammad Sohaib Asghar, Ahmed Kunwer Naveed, Waqas Ullah, Salim Surani

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. The Hidden Pandemic of COVID-19-Induced Organizing Pneumonia.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Farah YasminDepartment of Internal Medicine, Dow Medical College, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan.
Hala NajeebDepartment of Internal Medicine, Dow Medical College, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan.ORCID 0000-0001-7075-4674
Abdul MoeedDepartment of Internal Medicine, Dow Medical College, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan.ORCID 0000-0003-4429-1391
Wardah HassanDepartment of Internal Medicine, Dow Medical College, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan.
Mahima KhatriDepartment of Internal Medicine, Dow Medical College, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan.
Muhammad Sohaib AsgharDepartment of Internal Medicine, Dow Ojha University Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan.
Ahmed Kunwer NaveedDepartment of Internal Medicine, Dow Medical College, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan.ORCID 0000-0002-4215-0600
Waqas UllahThomas Jefferson University Hospitals, Philadelphia, PA, United States of America.
Salim SuraniAdjunct Clinical Professor of Medicine and Pharmacology, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-7105-4266
Dow University of Health Sciences · PKThomas Jefferson University Hospital · USUniversity of Houston · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundColchicine has been used an effective anti-inflammatory drug to treat gout diseases. Owing to its pharmacodynamic of inhibiting interleukins, it has been repurposed to target the cytokine storm post-SARS-CoV-2 invasion. The goal of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the safety profile of colchicine in COVID-19 patients using the gold-standard randomised-control trials.

methodsElectronic databases (Pubmed, Google Scholar, and Cochrane) were systematically searched until June 2021 and RCTs were extracted. Outcomes of interest included all-cause mortality, COVID-19 severity, mechanical ventilation, C-reactive protein and D-dimer levels. Using a random-effects model, dichotomous outcomes were pooled using odds ratios (OR) through the generic inverse variance formula while weighted mean differences were calculated using the Wan's method. P-values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant for all outcomes.

resultsA total population of 16,048 from five RCTs were included in the analysis. Of this, 7957 were randomized to colchicine, and 8091 received standard care, with an average age of 60.67 years. Colchicine was observed to significantly reduce COVID-19 severity (OR: 0.41, 95% CI [0.22, 0.76]; p = 0.005), and CRP levels (WMD: -19.99, 95% CI [-32.09, -7.89]; p = 0.001). However, there was no significant difference in D-dimer levels (WMD: 0.31, 95% CI [-0.61, 1.23]; p = 0.51), mechanical ventilation (OR: 0.42, 95% CI [0.17, 1.03]; p = 0.06; I2 = 74%) and all-cause mortality (OR: 0.98, 95% CI [0.83, 1.16]; p = 0.84) among patients receiving colchicine or standard care.

conclusionColchicine treatment decreased CRP levels and COVID-19 severity, with dimer levels, all-cause mortality and mechanical ventilation remaining seemingly unaffected. Thus, clinical trials need to be carried out that allow effective evaluation of colchicine in COVID-19 patients.

Indexed as

ColchicineCOVID-19 Drug TreatmentC-Reactive ProteinHumansMiddle AgedOdds RatioRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRespiration, ArtificialSARS-CoV-2ColchicineC-Reactive Protein

Identifiers

PMID35381033
PMCPMC8982874
OpenAlexW4226343207

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.