Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35381025›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

Evaluation of community-based screening tools for the early screening of osteoporosis in postmenopausal Vietnamese women.

My Hanh Bui, Phuoc Thang Dao, Quynh Long Khuong, Phuong-Anh Le, Thuy-Trang Thi Nguyen, Gia Du Hoang, Tu Hoang Le, Hoai Thu Pham, Hong-Xuyen Thi Hoang, Quang Cuong Le and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. A comprehensive evaluation of seven osteoporosis screening tools.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

My Hanh BuiHanoi Medical University, Hanoi, Vietnam.
Phuoc Thang DaoInteractive Research and Development, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
Quynh Long KhuongHanoi University of Public Health, Hanoi, Vietnam.
Phuong-Anh LeHanoi Medical University Hospital, Hanoi, Vietnam.
Thuy-Trang Thi NguyenHanoi Medical University Hospital, Hanoi, Vietnam.
Gia Du HoangBach Mai Hospital, Dong Da, Hanoi, Vietnam.
Tu Hoang LeViet Duc Hospital, Hoan Kiem, Hanoi, Vietnam.
Hoai Thu PhamHanoi Medical University, Hanoi, Vietnam.
Hong-Xuyen Thi HoangHanoi Medical University Hospital, Hanoi, Vietnam.ORCID 0000-0002-3849-2907
Quang Cuong LeHanoi Medical University, Hanoi, Vietnam.
Xuan Thanh DaoHanoi Medical University, Hanoi, Vietnam.ORCID 0000-0002-2245-8202
Hanoi Medical University · VNHanoi Medical University Hospital · VNBạch Mai Hospital · VNHanoi University · VNViet Duc Hospital · VN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOsteoporosis affects people worldwide. However, there are few validated tools for the early screening of osteoporosis in Vietnam. We set out to evaluate the performance of the osteoporosis self-assessment tool for Asians (OSTA) and the osteoporosis screening tool for Chinese (OSTC) for the early screening of osteoporosis in postmenopausal Vietnamese women.

methodsWe analyzed retrospective data from 797 postmenopausal Vietnamese women. The bone mineral density (BMD) in the lumbar vertebrae (L1-L4) and the left and right femoral necks of all participants were measured using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Osteoporosis was defined as the BMD (T-score) < -2.5. The OSTA and OSTC scores were calculated from the age and weight of participants. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was conducted to compare the performance of the two tools with the BMD measurements by DXA at different anatomical sites.

resultsThe rates of osteoporosis determined by BMD varied between anatomical sites, and ranged from 43.4% to 54.7% in the lumbar vertebrae and 29.2% and 8.9% in the left and right femoral necks, respectively. For the vertebrae, the area under the curve (AUC) for OSTA ranged from 70.9% to 73.9% and for OSTC ranged from 68.7% to 71.6%. The predictive value of both tools was higher for femoral necks, with the AUC of OSTA for the left and right femoral necks being 80.0% and 85.8%, respectively. The corresponding figures for OSTC were 80.5% and 86.4%, respectively. The highest sensitivity and specificity of OSTA were 74.6% and 81.4%, while these figures for OSTC were 73.9% and 82.6%, respectively.

conclusionOSTA and OSTC were shown to be useful self-assessment tools for osteoporosis detection in Vietnam postmenopausal women. Further research is encouraged to determine the applicability of tools for other populations and settings.

Indexed as

OsteoporosisOsteoporosis, PostmenopausalAbsorptiometry, PhotonBone DensityFemaleHumansLumbar VertebraeMass ScreeningPostmenopauseRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentSensitivity and SpecificityVietnam

Identifiers

PMID35381025
PMCPMC8982873
OpenAlexW4226008204

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.