Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35380725›Full record

Trial reportThe oncologist2022

Three-Year Outcomes of a Phase II Study of Perioperative Capecitabine Plus Oxaliplatin Therapy for Clinical SS/SE N1-3 M0 Gastric Cancer (OGSG 1601).

Jin Matsuyama, Tetsuji Terazawa, Masahiro Goto, Ryohei Kawabata, Shunji Endo, Motohiro Imano, Shoichiro Fujita, Yusuke Akamaru, Hirokazu Taniguchi, Mitsutoshi Tatsumi and 8 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase II
In one paragraph

Trial report in The oncologist, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 55% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 13 institutions in 1 country.

Jin MatsuyamaDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Higashiosaka City Medical Center, Higashiosaka, Japan.
Tetsuji TerazawaDepartment of Cancer Chemotherapy Center, Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University, Takatsuki, Japan.
Masahiro GotoDepartment of Cancer Chemotherapy Center, Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University, Takatsuki, Japan.
Ryohei KawabataDepartment of Surgery, Osaka Rosai Hospital, Sakai, Japan.
Shunji EndoDepartment of Surgery, Yao Municipal Hospital, Yao, Japan.
Motohiro ImanoDepartment of Surgery, Kindai University School of Medicine, Sayama, Japan.
Shoichiro FujitaDepartment of Surgery, NTT West Osaka Hospital, Osaka, Japan.
Yusuke AkamaruDepartment of Surgery, Ikeda City Hospital, Ikeda, Japan.
Hirokazu TaniguchiDepartment of Surgery, Minoh City Hospital, Minoh, Japan.
Mitsutoshi TatsumiDepartment of Surgery, Hoshigaoka Medical Center, Hirakata, Japan.
Sang-Woong LeeDepartment of General and Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University, Takatsuki, Japan.
Hisato KawakamiDepartment of Medical Oncology, Kindai University School of Medicine, Sayama, Japan.
Yukinori KurokawaDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Japan.
Toshio ShimokawaDepartment of Clinical Study Support Center, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan.
Daisuke SakaiDepartment of Frontier Science for Cancer and Chemotherapy, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Japan.
Takeshi KatoDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka National Hospital, Osaka, Japan.
Kazumasa FujitaniDepartment of Surgery, Osaka General Medical Center, Osaka, Japan.
Taroh SatohDepartment of Frontier Science for Cancer and Chemotherapy, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Japan.
Osaka University · JPOsaka University of Pharmaceutical Sciences · JPKindai University · JPHoshigaoka Medical Center · JPIkeda Municipal Hospital · JPMinoh City Hospital · JPNaga Municipal Hospital · JPNTT WEST Osaka Hospital · JPOsaka City General Hospital · JPOsaka National Hospital · JPOsaka Prefectural Medical Center · JPOsaka Rosai Hospital · JPWakayama Medical University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWe previously reported the good feasibility and favorable efficacy of perioperative capecitabine plus oxaliplatin (CapeOx) in patients (pts) with clinical T3(SS)/T4a(SE) N1-3 M0 gastric cancer (GC) in a phase II study in which the pathological response rate, the primary endpoint, of 54.1% was demonstrated. Here, we report 3-year follow-up data.

methodsThe eligibility criteria included clinical T3(SS)/T4a(SE) N1-3 M0 GC according to the Japanese Classification of Gastric Carcinoma-3rd English Edition (JCGC). Three cycles of neoadjuvant CapeOx (capecitabine, 2000mg/m2 for 14 days; oxaliplatin, 130mg/m2 on day 1, every 3 weeks) were administered, followed by 5 cycles of adjuvant CapeOx after D2 gastrectomy. Three-year overall survival and relapse-free survival are presented here, and analyzed by cohorts based on pathologic response rate (pRR).

resultsThirty-seven pts were enrolled from July 2016 to May 2017, and fully evaluated for efficacy and toxicity. Thirty-three pts (89.2%) completed the planned three cycles of neoadjuvant CapeOx and underwent gastrectomy, with an R0 resection rate of 78.4% (n = 29). The overall survival (OS) rate and relapse-free survival (RFS) rate at 3 years was 83.8% (95% CI, 72.7-96.5%) and 73.0% (95% CI, 60.0-88.8%), respectively. Further, the 3-year OS rate in pts with pathological response of grade 1a (n = 13) and grade 1b or higher (n = 20) was 69.2% (95% CI: 48.2-99.5%) and 100.0%, respectively, based on JCGC. Pathological response rate was classified according to JCGC as follows: grade 0, the tumor was not affected; grade 1a, less than one-third of the tumor was affected; grade 1b, one to two thirds of the tumor was affected; grade 2, greater than or equal to two thirds was affected; and grade 3, no residual tumor. A pathological response was defined as grade 1b or greater.

conclusionPerioperative CapeOx showed good feasibility and favorable prognosis, especially in pts with pathological response of grade 1b or higher and was found to be useful in predicting prognosis. The data obtained using this novel approach warrant further investigation (Trial ID: UMIN000021641, jRCTs051180109).

Indexed as

Stomach NeoplasmsAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCapecitabineGastrectomyHumansNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalOxaliplatinCapecitabineOxaliplatincapecitabinegastric canceroxaliplatinperioperative chemotherapy

Identifiers

PMID35380725
PMCPMC8982391
OpenAlexW4206264158

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.