Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35380724›Full record

ArticleThe oncologist2022

Position Statement on the Diagnosis, Treatment, and Response Evaluation to Systemic Therapies of Advanced Neuroendocrine Tumors, With a Special Focus on Radioligand Therapy.

Jaume Capdevila, Enrique Grande, Rocío García-Carbonero, Marc Simó, Mª Isabel Del Olmo-García, Paula Jiménez-Fonseca, Alberto Carmona-Bayonas, Virginia Pubul

Abstract readConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Article in The oncologist, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jaume CapdevilaDepartment of Medical Oncology, Vall Hebron University Hospital, Vall Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), IOB-Quiron-Teknon Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Enrique GrandeDepartment of Medical Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Madrid, Spain.
Rocío García-CarboneroDepartment of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario Doce de Octubre, Madrid, Spain.
Marc SimóDepartment of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain.
Mª Isabel Del Olmo-GarcíaDepartment of Endocrinology, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico la Fe de Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
Paula Jiménez-FonsecaDepartment of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias, ISPA, Madrid, Spain.
Alberto Carmona-BayonasDepartment of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Hospital General Universitario Morales Meseguer, University of Murcia, IMIB, CP13/00126, PI17/0050 (ISCIII & FEDER) and Fundación Séneca (04515/GERM/06), Murcia, Spain.
Virginia PubulDepartment of Nuclear Medicine Department and Molecular Imaging Research Group, University Hospital and Health Research Institute of Santiago de Compostela (IDIS), Santiago de Compostela, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe aim of this study was to provide a guidance for the management of neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) in clinical practice. MATERIAL AND

methodsNominal group and Delphi techniques were used. A steering committee of 8 experts reviewed the current management of NETs, identified controversies and gaps, critically analyzed the available evidence, and formulated several guiding statements for clinicians. Subsequently, a panel of 26 experts, was selected to test agreement with the statements through 2 Delphi rounds. Items were scored on a 4-point Likert scale from 1 = totally agree to 4 = totally disagree. The agreement was considered if ≥75% of answers pertained to Categories 1 and 2 (consensus with the agreement) or Categories 3 and 4 (consensus with the disagreement).

resultsOverall, 132 statements were proposed, which incorporated the following areas: (1) overarching principles; (2) progression and treatment response criteria; (3) advanced gastro-enteric NETs; (4) advanced pancreatic NETs; (5) advanced NETs in other locations; (6) re-treatment with radioligand therapy (RLT); (7) neoadjuvant therapy. After 2 Delphi rounds, only 4 statements lacked a clear consensus. RLT was not only recommended in the sequencing of different NETs but also as neoadjuvant treatment, while several indications for retreatment with RLT were also established.

conclusionThis document sought to pull together the experts' attitudes when dealing with different clinical scenarios of patients suffering from NETs, with RLT having a specific role where evidence-based data are limited.

Indexed as

Neuroendocrine TumorsConsensusHumansadvancedneoadjuvant therapyneuroendocrine tumorspeptide receptor radionuclide therapyprogressionretreatmentsequencing

Identifiers

PMID35380724
PMCPMC8982404

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.