Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35380712›Full record

ArticleThe oncologist2022

The Essentials of Multiomics.

John L Marshall, Beth N Peshkin, Takayuki Yoshino, Jakob Vowinckel, Håvard E Danielsen, Gerry Melino, Ioannis Tsamardinos, Christian Haudenschild, David J Kerr, Carlos Sampaio and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The oncologist, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Antibiotic resistance inFrontiers in microbiology · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Transcriptome and proteome analyses reveal high nitrate or ammonium applications alleviate photosynthetic decline ofPhysiology and molecular biology of plants : an international journal of functional plant biology · 2024
    Article
  7. Omics and Multi-Omics in IBD: No Integration, No Breakthroughs.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Disease markers · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 13 institutions in 10 countries.

John L MarshallLombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3449-2344
Beth N PeshkinGeorgetown University, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Washington, DC, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2997-4701
Takayuki YoshinoNational Cancer Center Hospital East, Chiba, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-0489-4756
Jakob VowinckelBiognosys AG, Schlieren, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-4343-4058
Håvard E DanielsenInstitute for Cancer Genetics and Informatics, Oslo University Hospital, Radiumhospitalet, Montebello, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-6798-4724
Gerry MelinoDepartment of Experimental Medicine, TOR, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9428-5972
Ioannis TsamardinosJADBio Gnosis DA, N. Plastira 100, Science and Technology Park of Crete and Institute of Applied and Computational Mathematics, Foundation for Research and Technology Hellas, Heraklion, GR, Greece.ORCID 0000-0002-2492-959X
Christian HaudenschildPersonalis, Inc., Menlo Park, CA, USA.
David J KerrNuffield Division of Clinical and Laboratory Sciences, Level 4, Academic Block, John Radcliffe Infirmary, Headington, Oxford, UK.
Carlos SampaioClinica AMO, Rio Vermelho, Salvador-BA, Brasil.ORCID 0000-0002-9786-2306
Sun Young RhaYonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seodaemun-Ku, Seoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-2512-4531
Kevin T FitzGeraldDepartment of Medical Humanities in the School of Medicine, Creighton University, Omaha, NE, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5843-1557
Eric C HollandDivision of Human Biology, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3792-7120
David GallagherSt. James's Hospital/Trinity College Dublin, St. Raphael's House, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0002-4468-5991
Jesus Garcia-FoncillasCancer Institute, Fundacion Jimenez Diaz University Hospital, Autonomous University, Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-7591-8006
Hartmut JuhlIndivumed GmbH, Hamburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7373-6703
Georgetown University · USBiognosys (Switzerland) · CHCreighton University · USFred Hutch Cancer Center · USHospital Universitario Fundación Jiménez Díaz · ESJohn Radcliffe Hospital · GBNational Cancer Center Hospital East · JPOslo University Hospital · NOPersonalis (United States) · USScience and Technology Park of Crete · GRTrinity College Dublin · IEUniversity of Rome Tor Vergata · ITYonsei University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Within the last decade, the science of molecular testing has evolved from single gene and single protein analysis to broad molecular profiling as a standard of care, quickly transitioning from research to practice. Terms such as genomics, transcriptomics, proteomics, circulating omics, and artificial intelligence are now commonplace, and this rapid evolution has left us with a significant knowledge gap within the medical community. In this paper, we attempt to bridge that gap and prepare the physician in oncology for multiomics, a group of technologies that have gone from looming on the horizon to become a clinical reality. The era of multiomics is here, and we must prepare ourselves for this exciting new age of cancer medicine.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceNeoplasmsGenomicsHumansMedical OncologyProteomicsartificial intelligencecancerdigital pathologygenomicsmachine learningmultiomicsproteomicstranscriptomics

Identifiers

PMID35380712
PMCPMC8982374
OpenAlexW4206527380

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.