Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35380705›Full record

ArticleNeuro-oncology2022

Hypothetical generalized framework for a new imaging endpoint of therapeutic activity in early phase clinical trials in brain tumors.

Benjamin M Ellingson, Elizabeth R Gerstner, Andrew B Lassman, Caroline Chung, Howard Colman, Patricia E Cole, David Leung, Joshua E Allen, Manmeet S Ahluwalia, Jerrold Boxerman and 16 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuro-oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. IDH mutant high-grade gliomas.Frontiers in molecular neuroscience · 2025
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Tumor Volume Growth Rates and Doubling Times during Active Surveillance of IDH-mutant Low-Grade Glioma.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2024
    Article
  12. Impact of Frontline Ivosidenib on Volumetric Growth Patterns in Isocitrate Dehydrogenase-mutant Astrocytic and Oligodendroglial Tumors.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2023
    Article
  13. RANO 2.0: Update to the Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology Criteria for High- and Low-Grade Gliomas in Adults.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Novel Clinical Trial Designs in Neuro-Oncology.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2022
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

26 authors at 16 institutions in 3 countries.

Benjamin M EllingsonUCLA Brain Tumor Imaging Laboratory, Center for Computer Vision and Imaging Biomarkers, Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Elizabeth R GerstnerMassachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Andrew B LassmanDivision of Neuro-Oncology, Department of Neurology, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7386-9928
Caroline ChungUniversity of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Howard ColmanHuntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
Patricia E ColeBayer Pharmaceuticals, Whippany, New Jersey, USA.
David LeungBristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, New Jersey, USA.
Joshua E AllenChimerix, Durham, North California, USA.
Manmeet S AhluwaliaMiami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, Florida, USA.
Jerrold BoxermanRhode Island Hospital and Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0594-1542
Matthew BrownUCLA Brain Tumor Imaging Laboratory, Center for Computer Vision and Imaging Biomarkers, Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Jonathan GoldinUCLA Brain Tumor Imaging Laboratory, Center for Computer Vision and Imaging Biomarkers, Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Edjah NduomDepartment of Neurosurgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Islam HassanServier Pharmaceuticals, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Mark R GilbertDepartment of Neurosurgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Ingo K MellinghoffDepartment of Neurology and Human Oncology and Pathogenesis Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
Michael WellerDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital and University of Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-1748-174X
Susan ChangDivision of Neuro-Oncology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
David AronsNational Brain Tumor Society, Newton, Massachusetts, USA.
Clair MeehanNational Brain Tumor Society, Newton, Massachusetts, USA.
Wendy SeligWSCollaborative, LLC, McLean, Virginia, USA.
Kirk TannerNational Brain Tumor Society, Newton, Massachusetts, USA.
W K Alfred YungUniversity of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Martin van den BentBrain Tumor Center at Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Patrick Y WenDana Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Timothy F CloughesyUCLA Neuro Oncology Program, Department of Neurology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA.
University of California, Los Angeles · USNational Brain Tumor Society · USEmory University · USHarvard University · USThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USBaptist Hospital of Miami · USBayer (United States) · USBristol-Myers Squibb (United States) · USBrown University · USChimerix (United States) · USErasmus MC Cancer Institute · NLMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USNewYork–Presbyterian Hospital · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · USUniversity of Utah · USUniversity of Zurich · CH

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Hongbiao Carl Lekaye · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
Women's CancersP30CA016042 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI Samuel Wheeler French · 1985 to 2026
$134.5M
Tumor Biology and Microenvironment ProgramP30CA013696 · NCI · COLUMBIA UNIV NEW YORK MORNINGSIDE · PI Anil K Rustgi · 1985 to 2026
$115.3M
UCLA SPORE in Brain CancerP50CA211015 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI Yvonne Yu-Hsuan Chen · 2017 to 2026
$25.2M
Brain Tumor Clinical and Clinical Research Program (Clinical Support Services)ZIDBC011642 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI OZER, BYRAM · 2015 to 2025
$23.4M
Columbia University NCI Community Oncology Research ProgramUG1CA189960 · NCI · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI Jennifer E. Amengual, Lisa A. Kachnic · 2014 to 2026
$12.7M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NCI NIH HHS P30 CA013696NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016042NCI NIH HHS P50 CA211015NCI NIH HHS UG1 CA189960
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Imaging response assessment is a cornerstone of patient care and drug development in oncology. Clinicians/clinical researchers rely on tumor imaging to estimate the impact of new treatments and guide decision making for patients and candidate therapies. This is important in brain cancer, where associations between tumor size/growth and emerging neurological deficits are strong. Accurately measuring the impact of a new therapy on tumor growth early in clinical development, where patient numbers are small, would be valuable for decision making regarding late-stage development activation. Current attempts to measure the impact of a new therapy have limited influence on clinical development, as determination of progression, stability or response does not currently account for individual tumor growth kinetics prior to the initiation of experimental therapies. Therefore, we posit that imaging-based response assessment, often used as a tool for estimating clinical effect, is incomplete as it does not adequately account for growth trajectories or biological characteristics of tumors prior to the introduction of an investigational agent. Here, we propose modifications to the existing framework for evaluating imaging assessment in primary brain tumors that will provide a more reliable understanding of treatment effects. Measuring tumor growth trajectories prior to a given intervention may allow us to more confidently conclude whether there is an anti-tumor effect. This updated approach to imaging-based tumor response assessment is intended to improve our ability to select candidate therapies for later-stage development, including those that may not meet currently sought thresholds for "response" and ultimately lead to identification of effective treatments.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsClinical Trials as TopicDiagnostic ImagingHumansTreatment Outcomebrain tumorsclinical trialsgrowth ratesresponse assessment

Identifiers

PMID35380705
PMCPMC9340639
OpenAlexW4226100470

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.