Article in Molecular cancer research : MCR, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registry
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
3 · Its place in the literature
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
5 · Who and what money
Authors and funding
13 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Colin J DanielDepartment of Molecular and Medical Genetics, School of Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon.
Carl PelzDepartment of Molecular and Medical Genetics, School of Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon.
Xiaoyan WangDepartment of Molecular and Medical Genetics, School of Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon.
Michael W MunksDepartment of Molecular Microbiology and Immunology, School of Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon.ORCID 0000-0002-0335-7238
Aaron KoDepartment of Molecular Microbiology and Immunology, School of Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon.
Dhaarini MuruganDepartment of Cell, Developmental and Cancer Biology, School of Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon.ORCID 0000-0001-8505-5868
Sarah A ByersDepartment of Molecular and Medical Genetics, School of Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon.
Eleonora JuarezDepartment of Molecular and Medical Genetics, School of Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon.ORCID 0000-0001-8130-605X
Karyn L TaylorDepartment of Molecular and Medical Genetics, School of Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon.
Guang FanDepartment of Pathology, School of Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon.
Lisa M CoussensDepartment of Cell, Developmental and Cancer Biology, School of Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon.ORCID 0000-0003-2389-1865
Jason M LinkDepartment of Molecular and Medical Genetics, School of Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon.
Rosalie C SearsDepartment of Molecular and Medical Genetics, School of Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon.ORCID 0000-0003-1558-2413
Oregon Health & Science University · US
Funding
Understanding the origins of rapid recurrence of pancreatic cancer after resectionP30CA069533 · NCI · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI Luiz Eduardo Bertassoni · 1997 to 2026
$60.5M
Understanding the Impact of Microscale and Nanoscale Heterogeneity and ResistanceU54CA209988 · NCI · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI DEMIR, EMEK, HEISER, LAURA MADELINE · 2017 to 2021
$10.3M
Omic and Multidimensional Spatial Atlas of Metastatic Breast CancerU2CCA233280 · NCI · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI GOECKS, JEREMY · 2018 to 2023
$9.7M
Hydroxylation regulation of c-MycR01CA186241 · NCI · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI Mu-Shui Dai, ROSALIE C SEARS · 2015 to 2026
$4.2M
Cellular Mechanisms Controlling Myc Protein StabilityR01CA100855 · NCI · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI SEARS, ROSALIE C · 2003 to 2014
$3.6M
Comparative analysis between patient-derived models of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas and matched tumor specimensU01CA224012 · NCI · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI BRODY, JONATHAN, COUSSENS, LISA M. · 2019 to 2023
$2.9M
The Role of post-translational activation of Myc in pancreatic cancerR01CA196228 · NCI · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI SEARS, ROSALIE C · 2015 to 2019
$2.0M
c-Myc Phosphorylation Sites Regulate Its Apoptotic and Tumorigenic PotentialR01CA129040 · NCI · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI SEARS, ROSALIE C · 2008 to 2012
As a transcription factor that promotes cell growth, proliferation, and apoptosis, c-MYC (MYC) expression in the cell is tightly controlled. Disruption of oncogenic signaling pathways in human cancers can increase MYC protein stability, due to altered phosphorylation ratios at two highly conserved sites, Threonine 58 (T58) and Serine 62 (S62). The T58 to Alanine mutant (T58A) of MYC mimics the stabilized, S62 phosphorylated, and highly oncogenic form of MYC. The S62A mutant is also stabilized, lacks phosphorylation at both Serine 62 and Threonine 58, and has been shown to be nontransforming in vitro. However, several regulatory proteins are reported to associate with MYC lacking phosphorylation at S62 and T58, and the role this form of MYC plays in MYC transcriptional output and in vivo oncogenic function is understudied. We generated conditional c-Myc knock-in mice in which the expression of wild-type MYC (MYCWT), the T58A mutant (MYCT58A), or the S62A mutant (MYCS62A) with or without expression of endogenous Myc is controlled by the T-cell-specific Lck-Cre recombinase. MYCT58A expressing mice developed clonal T-cell lymphomas with 100% penetrance and conditional knock-out of endogenous Myc accelerated this lymphomagenesis. In contrast, MYCS62A mice developed clonal T-cell lymphomas at a much lower penetrance, and the loss of endogenous MYC reduced the penetrance while increasing the appearance of a non-transgene driven B-cell lymphoma with splenomegaly. Together, our study highlights the importance of regulated phosphorylation of MYC at T58 and S62 for T-cell transformation. IMPLICATIONS: Dysregulation of phosphorylation at conserved T58 and S62 residues of MYC differentially affects T-cell development and lymphomagenesis.
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.
T-cell Dysfunction upon Expression of MYC with Altered Phosphorylation at Threonine 58 and Serine 62. · full record | OpenQuestion