Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35380672›Full record

ArticleThe international journal of neuropsychopharmacology2022

Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Attentional Bias to Methamphetamine Cues and Its Association With EEG-Derived Functional Brain Network Topology.

Hassan Khajehpour, Muhammad A Parvaz, Mayadeh Kouti, Taherehalsadat Hosseini Rafsanjani, Hamed Ekhtiari, Sepideh Bakht, Alireza Noroozi, Bahador Makkiabadi, Maryam Mahmoodi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The international journal of neuropsychopharmacology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. An electroencephalography connectome predictive model of craving for methamphetamine.International journal of clinical and health psychology : IJCHP
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Hassan KhajehpourMultimodal Functional Imaging Lab, Department of Physics and PERFORM Centre, Concordia University, Montreal, Quebec,Canada.
Muhammad A ParvazDepartment of Psychiatry, Icahn School of Medicine, Mount Sinai, New York, USA.
Mayadeh KoutiDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Shohadaye Hoveizeh Campus of Technology, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Ahvaz, Iran.
Taherehalsadat Hosseini RafsanjaniDepartment of Nursing, Razi School of Nursing and Midwifery, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran.
Hamed EkhtiariLaureate Institute for Brain Research, Tulsa, Oklahoma, USA.
Sepideh BakhtDepartment of Cognitive Psychology, Institute for Cognitive Sciences Studies, Tehran, Iran.
Alireza NorooziNeuroscience and Addiction Studies Department, School of Advanced Technologies in Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran (Dr Noroozi).
Bahador MakkiabadiDepartment of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran,Iran.
Maryam MahmoodiDepartment of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran,Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has shown to potentially mitigate drug craving and attentional bias to drug-related stimuli, individual differences in such modulatory effects of tDCS are less understood. In this study, we aimed to investigate a source of the inter-subject variability in the tDCS effects that can be useful for tDCS-based treatments of individuals with methamphetamine (MA) use disorder (IMUD).

methodsForty-two IMUD (all male) were randomly assigned to receive a single-session of either sham or real bilateral tDCS (anodal right/cathodal left) over the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. The tDCS effect on MA craving and biased attention to drug stimuli were investigated by quantifying EEG-derived P3 (a measure of initial attentional bias) and late positive potential (LPP; a measure of sustained motivated attention) elicited by these stimuli. To assess the association of changes in P3 and LPP with brain connectivity network (BCN) topology, the correlation between topology metrics, specifically those related to the efficiency of information processing, and the tDCS effect was investigated.

resultsThe P3 amplitude significantly decreased following the tDCS session, whereas the amplitudes increased in the sham group. The changes in P3 amplitudes were significantly correlated with communication efficiency measured by BCN topology metrics (r = -0.47, P = .03; r = -0.49, P = .02). There was no significant change in LPP amplitude due to the tDCS application.

conclusionsThese findings validate that tDCS mitigates initial attentional bias, but not the sustained motivated attention, to MA stimuli. Importantly, however, results also show that the individual differences in the effects of tDCS may be underpinned by communication efficiency of the BCN topology, and therefore, these BCN topology metrics may have the potential to robustly predict the effectiveness of tDCS-based interventions on MA craving and attentional bias to MA stimuli among IMUD.

Indexed as

Attentional BiasMethamphetamineTranscranial Direct Current StimulationBrainCuesElectroencephalographyHumansMalePrefrontal CortexMethamphetaminecravingevent-related potentialsfunctional brain network topologymethamphetaminetDCS

Identifiers

PMID35380672
PMCPMC9380716

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.