Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35380639›Full record

ReviewClinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research2022

Intratumor Heterogeneity and Antitumor Immunity Shape One Another Bidirectionally.

Yochai Wolf, Yardena Samuels

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Histotripsy for Liver Tumors: Breakthrough or Hype?Annals of surgical oncology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yochai WolfElla Lemelbaum Institute for Immuno-Oncology and Skin Cancer, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Ramat Gan, Israel.ORCID 0000-0003-0270-2025
Yardena SamuelsDepartment of Molecular Cell Biology, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel.ORCID 0000-0002-3349-7266
Sheba Medical Center · ILWeizmann Institute of Science · IL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over the last decade, it has become clear that the genomic landscapes of tumors profoundly impact their immunogenicity and how tumor cells interact with immune cells. Whereas past discoveries mainly focused on the interplay between tumor immunogenicity and tumor mutational burden (TMB), under the assumption that a higher mutation load would give rise to a better patient response to immune checkpoint blockade therapies, we and others have underlined intratumor heterogeneity (ITH) as an important determinant of the magnitude of the antitumor response and the nature of the tumor microenvironment. In this review, we define TMB versus ITH and how the two factors are being inferred from data, examine key findings in the cancer immunogenomics literature deciphering the complex cross-talk between TMB, ITH, and antitumor immunity in human cancers and in vivo models, and discuss the mutual influence of ITH and immunity-how the antitumor response can give rise to tumors with higher ITH, and how higher ITH can put shackles on the antitumor response.

Indexed as

Genetic HeterogeneityNeoplasmsAntigens, NeoplasmBiomarkers, TumorHumansMutationTumor MicroenvironmentAntigens, NeoplasmBiomarkers, Tumor

Identifiers

PMID35380639
PMCPMC9306293
OpenAlexW4225646790

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.