Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35380257›Full record

ArticleJournal of cancer research and clinical oncology2023

Current clinical practice and outcome of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for early breast cancer: analysis of individual data from 94,638 patients treated in 55 breast cancer centers.

O Ortmann, J-U Blohmer, N T Sibert, S Brucker, W Janni, A Wöckel, A Scharl, S Dieng, J Ferencz, E C Inwald and 3 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

O OrtmannDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Medical Center, Landshuter Straße 65, 93053, Regensburg, Germany. olaf.ortmann@klinik.uni-regensburg.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6238-3949
J-U BlohmerDepartment of Gynecology and Breast Center, Charité-Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany.
N T SibertGerman Cancer Society, Berlin, Germany.
S BruckerDepartment of Women's Health, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
W JanniDepartment of Gynecology, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
A WöckelDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
A ScharlFrauenklinik, Klinikum St. Marien Amberg, Amberg, Germany.
S DiengOnkoZert, Neu-Ulm, Germany.
J FerenczOnkoZert, Neu-Ulm, Germany.
E C InwaldDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Medical Center, Landshuter Straße 65, 93053, Regensburg, Germany.
S WesselmannGerman Cancer Society, Berlin, Germany.
C KowalskiGerman Cancer Society, Berlin, Germany.
for 55 breast cancer centers certified by the German Cancer Society
Neu-Ulm University of Applied Sciences · DEGerman Cancer Society · DEUniversitätsklinikum Würzburg · DEOlgahospital · DEUniversity of Tübingen · DEUniversity Hospital Regensburg · DECharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEUniversität Ulm · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) is frequently used in patients with early breast cancer. Randomized controlled trials have demonstrated similar survival after NACT or adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT). However, certain subtypes may benefit more when NACT contains regimes leading to high rates of pathologic complete response (pCR) rates. In this study we analyzed data using the OncoBox research from 94,638 patients treated in 55 breast cancer centers to describe the current clinical practice of and outcomes after NACT under routine conditions. These data were compared to patients treated with ACT. 40% of all patients received chemotherapy. The use of NACT increased over time from 5% in 2007 up to 17.3% in 2016. The proportion of patients receiving NACT varied by subtype. It was low in patients with HR-positive/HER2-negative breast cancer (5.8%). However, 31.8% of patients with triple-negative, 31.9% with HR-negative/HER2-positive, and 26.5% with HR-positive/HER2-positive breast cancer received NACT. The rates of pCR were higher in patients with HR-positive/HER2-positive, HR-negative/HER2-positive and triple-negative tumors (36, 53 and 38%) compared to HR-positive/HER2-negative tumors (12%). PCR was achieved more often in HER2-positive and triple-negative tumors over time.This is the largest study on use and effects of NACT in German breast cancer centers. It demonstrates the increased use of NACT based on recommendations in current clinical guidelines. An improvement of pCR was shown in particular in HER2-positive and triple-negative breast cancer, which is consistent with data from randomized controlled trails.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsTriple Negative Breast NeoplasmsAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsChemotherapy, AdjuvantErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesFemaleHumansNeoadjuvant TherapyTreatment OutcomeErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesBreast cancer centersEarly breast cancerGuidelinesNeoadjuvant chemotherapyOncobox research

Identifiers

PMID35380257
PMCPMC9984341
OpenAlexW4226392645

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.