Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35380050›Full record

ReviewStroke2022

Neuroinflammation, Stem Cells, and Stroke.

Stefan Anthony, Dorothy Cabantan, Molly Monsour, Cesario V Borlongan

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Stroke, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 56 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
56citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
6.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

56 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 78 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Biology · 2025
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Network Medicine as a Tool to Enhance Regenerative Rehabilitation Practice.American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Stefan Anthony *Lake Erie College of Osteopathic Medicine, Bradenton, FL (S.A.).ORCID 0000-0003-1369-9626
Dorothy Cabantan *Lake Erie College of Osteopathic Medicine, Bradenton, FL (S.A.).ORCID 0000-0002-6346-3876
Molly Monsour *Center of Excellence for Aging and Brain Repair, Department of Neurosurgery and Brain Repair, University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa (M.M., C.V.B.).ORCID 0000-0001-9801-7465
Cesario V BorlonganCenter of Excellence for Aging and Brain Repair, Department of Neurosurgery and Brain Repair, University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa (M.M., C.V.B.).ORCID 0000-0002-2966-9782
Lake Erie College of Osteopathic Medicine · USUniversity of South Florida · US

Funding

MR Analysis of Pre-Conditioned Human Mesenchymal Stem Cells for Stroke TherapyR01NS102395 · NINDS · FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI GRANT, SAMUEL COLLES · 2017 to 2021
$1.7M
Re-Establishing Vascular Integrity in ALS via Endothelial Cell TransplantR01NS090962 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA · PI BORLONGAN, CESARIO V, GARBUZOVA-DAVIS, SVITLANA NICOLAI · 2015 to 2019
$1.6M
Optimizing Approaches to Endovascular Therapy of Acute Ischemic StrokeR21NS109575 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA · PI MOKIN, MAXIM · 2019 to 2019
$420k
Vascular repair extends therapeutic window for ischemic strokeR21NS089851 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA · PI BORLONGAN, CESARIO V · 2014 to 2015
$411k
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS090962NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS102395NINDS NIH HHS R21 NS089851NINDS NIH HHS R21 NS109575
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Stroke remains a significant unmet clinical need with few treatment options that have a very narrow therapeutic window, thereby causing massive mortality and morbidity in the United States and around the world. Accordingly, finding safe and effective novel treatments with a wider therapeutic window stands as an urgent need in stroke. The progressive inflammation that occurs centrally and peripherally after stroke serves as a unique therapeutic target to retard and even halt the secondary cell death. Stem cell therapy represents a potent approach that can diminish inflammation in both the stroke brain and periphery (eg, spleen), advancing a paradigm shift from a traditionally brain-focused therapy to treating stroke as a neurological disorder with a significant peripheral pathology. The purpose of this review article is to highlight the inflammation-mediated secondary cell death that plagues both brain and spleen in stroke and to evaluate the therapeutic potential of stem cell therapy in dampening these inflammatory responses.

Indexed as

Neuroinflammatory DiseasesStrokeHumansInflammationStem Cell TransplantationUnited Statesblood-brain barriercentral nervous systemhemorrhageinflammationinterleukin

Identifiers

PMID35380050
PMCPMC9038685
OpenAlexW4224929146

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.