Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35380023›Full record

ArticleJournal of Korean medical science2022

Comparison of Denosumab and Zoledronic Acid in Postmenopausal Women With Osteoporosis: Bone Mineral Density (BMD) and Trabecular Bone Score (TBS).

Taewook Kang, Si Young Park, Soon Hyuck Lee, Jong Hoon Park, Seung Woo Suh

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of Korean medical science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Management of bone health in cancer survivorship: a systematic review of clinical guidelines.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Long-term consequences of osteoporosis therapy with denosumab.Archives of endocrinology and metabolism · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Taewook KangDepartment of Orthopedics, Anam Hospital, Korea University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8721-6079
Si Young ParkDepartment of Orthopedics, Anam Hospital, Korea University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. drspine90@gmail.com.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1216-901X
Soon Hyuck LeeDepartment of Orthopedics, Anam Hospital, Korea University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6846-6155
Jong Hoon ParkDepartment of Orthopedics, Anam Hospital, Korea University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6798-6762
Seung Woo SuhDepartment of Orthopedics, Anam Hospital, Korea University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1536-4611
Korea University · JP

Funding

Korea University
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDenosumab (DEN) and zoledronic acid (ZOL) currently represent the most potent antiresorptive agents for the treatment of osteoporosis. Despite similar effects on bone resorption, these agents have distinct mechanisms of action. The objective of this study was to compare the effect of DEN and ZOL after two-year administration on bone mineral density (BMD), trabecular bone score (TBS), bone turnover markers, and persistence.

methodsA total of 585 postmenopausal women with osteoporosis who did not use osteoporosis medications were retrospectively reviewed. 290 patients were administered 60 mg DEN subcutaneously every 6 months from 2017 to 2018, and 295 patients were treated with 5 mg ZOL intravenously yearly from 2015 to 2017. BMD, TBS, and C-terminal cross-linking telopeptide of type 1 collagen (CTX) measurements were obtained at baseline and two-year after DEN injection or ZOL infusion.

resultsAfter two-year follow-up, 188 patients in the DEN group and 183 patients in the ZOL group were compared. BMD change from baseline at two years was significantly greater in the DEN group compared with the ZOL group (

conclusionIn postmenopausal women with osteoporosis, DEN was associated with greater BMD increase at all measured skeletal sites, greater increase of TBS, and greater inhibition of bone remodeling compared with ZOL.

Indexed as

DenosumabOsteoporosisBone DensityCancellous BoneFemaleHumansPostmenopauseRetrospective StudiesZoledronic AcidDenosumabZoledronic AcidDenosumabOsteoporosisZoledronic Acid

Identifiers

PMID35380023
PMCPMC8980365
OpenAlexW4213420857

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.