ArticleScientific reports2022
Tracking and predicting COVID-19 radiological trajectory on chest X-rays using deep learning.
Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Predicting Short-Term Outcome of COVID-19 Pneumonia Using Deep Learning-Based Automatic Detection Algorithm Analysis of Serial Chest Radiographs.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Temporal Radiographic Trajectory and Clinical Outcomes in COVID-19 Pneumonia: A Longitudinal Study.Journal of Korean medical science · 2025Article
- An artificial intelligence algorithm to select most viable embryos considering current process in IVF labs.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2024Article
- Assessing the prognostic utility of clinical and radiomic features for COVID-19 patients admitted to ICU: challenges and lessons learned.Harvard data science review · 2024Article
- Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Detecting COVID-19 Using Medical Images: A Survey.New generation computing · 2023Article
- Hybrid Bayesian Network-Based Modeling: COVID-19-Pneumonia Case.Journal of personalized medicine · 2022Article
- COVID-19 Diagnosis and Classification Using Radiological Imaging and Deep Learning Techniques: A Comparative Study.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Deep learning of chest X-rays can predict mechanical ventilation outcome in ICU-admitted COVID-19 patients.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Still a role for the chest radiograph - humble but helpful!African journal of thoracic and critical care medicine · 2022Article
- Applications of artificial intelligence in battling against covid-19: A literature review.Chaos, solitons, and fractals · 2021Review
- Deep Learning Approaches for Detecting COVID-19 From Chest X-Ray Images: A Survey.IEEE access : practical innovations, open solutions · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Radiological findings on chest X-ray (CXR) have shown to be essential for the proper management of COVID-19 patients as the maximum severity over the course of the disease is closely linked to the outcome. As such, evaluation of future severity from current CXR would be highly desirable. We trained a repurposed deep learning algorithm on the CheXnet open dataset (224,316 chest X-ray images of 65,240 unique patients) to extract features that mapped to radiological labels. We collected CXRs of COVID-19-positive patients from an open-source dataset (COVID-19 image data collection) and from a multi-institutional local ICU dataset. The data was grouped into pairs of sequential CXRs and were categorized into three categories: 'Worse', 'Stable', or 'Improved' on the basis of radiological evolution ascertained from images and reports. Classical machine-learning algorithms were trained on the deep learning extracted features to perform immediate severity evaluation and prediction of future radiological trajectory. Receiver operating characteristic analyses and Mann-Whitney tests were performed. Deep learning predictions between "Worse" and "Improved" outcome categories and for severity stratification were significantly different for three radiological signs and one diagnostic ('Consolidation', 'Lung Lesion', 'Pleural effusion' and 'Pneumonia'; all P < 0.05). Features from the first CXR of each pair could correctly predict the outcome category between 'Worse' and 'Improved' cases with a 0.81 (0.74-0.83 95% CI) AUC in the open-access dataset and with a 0.66 (0.67-0.64 95% CI) AUC in the ICU dataset. Features extracted from the CXR could predict disease severity with a 52.3% accuracy in a 4-way classification. Severity evaluation trained on the COVID-19 image data collection had good out-of-distribution generalization when testing on the local dataset, with 81.6% of intubated ICU patients being classified as critically ill, and the predicted severity was correlated with the clinical outcome with a 0.639 AUC. CXR deep learning features show promise for classifying disease severity and trajectory. Once validated in studies incorporating clinical data and with larger sample sizes, this information may be considered to inform triage decisions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.