Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35379856›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Tracking and predicting COVID-19 radiological trajectory on chest X-rays using deep learning.

Daniel Gourdeau, Olivier Potvin, Patrick Archambault, Carl Chartrand-Lefebvre, Louis Dieumegarde, Reza Forghani, Christian Gagné, Alexandre Hains, David Hornstein, Huy Le and 9 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Still a role for the chest radiograph - humble but helpful!African journal of thoracic and critical care medicine · 2022
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Deep Learning Approaches for Detecting COVID-19 From Chest X-Ray Images: A Survey.IEEE access : practical innovations, open solutions · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Daniel GourdeauUniversité Laval, Quebec, Canada. daniel.gourdeau.1@ulaval.ca.
Olivier PotvinUniversité Laval, Quebec, Canada.
Patrick ArchambaultUniversité Laval, Quebec, Canada.
Carl Chartrand-LefebvreUniversité de Montréal, Quebec, Canada.
Louis DieumegardeUniversité Laval, Quebec, Canada.
Reza ForghaniUniversité McGill, Quebec, Canada.
Christian GagnéUniversité Laval, Quebec, Canada.
Alexandre HainsUniversité Laval, Quebec, Canada.
David HornsteinUniversité McGill, Quebec, Canada.
Huy LeUniversité McGill, Quebec, Canada.
Simon LemieuxUniversité Laval, Quebec, Canada.
Marie-Hélène LévesqueUniversité Laval, Quebec, Canada.
Diego MartinUniversité McGill, Quebec, Canada.
Lorne RosenbloomUniversité McGill, Quebec, Canada.
An TangUniversité de Montréal, Quebec, Canada.
Fabrizio VecchioIRCCS San Raffaele Roma, Rome, Italy.
Issac YangUniversité McGill, Quebec, Canada.
Nathalie DuchesneUniversité Laval, Quebec, Canada.
Simon DuchesneUniversité Laval, Quebec, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Radiological findings on chest X-ray (CXR) have shown to be essential for the proper management of COVID-19 patients as the maximum severity over the course of the disease is closely linked to the outcome. As such, evaluation of future severity from current CXR would be highly desirable. We trained a repurposed deep learning algorithm on the CheXnet open dataset (224,316 chest X-ray images of 65,240 unique patients) to extract features that mapped to radiological labels. We collected CXRs of COVID-19-positive patients from an open-source dataset (COVID-19 image data collection) and from a multi-institutional local ICU dataset. The data was grouped into pairs of sequential CXRs and were categorized into three categories: 'Worse', 'Stable', or 'Improved' on the basis of radiological evolution ascertained from images and reports. Classical machine-learning algorithms were trained on the deep learning extracted features to perform immediate severity evaluation and prediction of future radiological trajectory. Receiver operating characteristic analyses and Mann-Whitney tests were performed. Deep learning predictions between "Worse" and "Improved" outcome categories and for severity stratification were significantly different for three radiological signs and one diagnostic ('Consolidation', 'Lung Lesion', 'Pleural effusion' and 'Pneumonia'; all P < 0.05). Features from the first CXR of each pair could correctly predict the outcome category between 'Worse' and 'Improved' cases with a 0.81 (0.74-0.83 95% CI) AUC in the open-access dataset and with a 0.66 (0.67-0.64 95% CI) AUC in the ICU dataset. Features extracted from the CXR could predict disease severity with a 52.3% accuracy in a 4-way classification. Severity evaluation trained on the COVID-19 image data collection had good out-of-distribution generalization when testing on the local dataset, with 81.6% of intubated ICU patients being classified as critically ill, and the predicted severity was correlated with the clinical outcome with a 0.639 AUC. CXR deep learning features show promise for classifying disease severity and trajectory. Once validated in studies incorporating clinical data and with larger sample sizes, this information may be considered to inform triage decisions.

Indexed as

COVID-19Deep LearningHumansRadiographyROC Curve

Identifiers

PMID35379856
PMCPMC8978501

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.