Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35379850›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Chromatic discrimination in fixed saturation levels from trichromats and subjects with congenital color vision deficiency.

Yuzo Igarashi, Luiza Karina Gonçalves Meireles, Felipe André Costa Brito, Leonardo Ramos Nicolau da Costa, Joyce Dos Santos Freitas, Leticia Miquilini, Luiz Claudio Portnoi Baran, Leonardo Dutra Henriques, Einat Hauzman, Daniela Maria Oliveira Bonci and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 52% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Chromatic discrimination in fixed saturation levels from tufted capuchin monkeys with different color vision genotypes.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2024
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yuzo IgarashiNúcleo de Teoria e Pesquisa do Comportamento, Universidade Federal do Pará, Av. Generalissimo Deodoro 92, Umarizal, Belém, 66055-240, Brazil.
Luiza Karina Gonçalves MeirelesNúcleo de Teoria e Pesquisa do Comportamento, Universidade Federal do Pará, Av. Generalissimo Deodoro 92, Umarizal, Belém, 66055-240, Brazil.
Felipe André Costa BritoInstituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal do Pará, Belém, Brazil.
Leonardo Ramos Nicolau da CostaInstituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal do Pará, Belém, Brazil.
Joyce Dos Santos FreitasNúcleo de Medicina Tropical, Universidade Federal do Pará, Belém, Brazil.
Leticia MiquiliniNúcleo de Teoria e Pesquisa do Comportamento, Universidade Federal do Pará, Av. Generalissimo Deodoro 92, Umarizal, Belém, 66055-240, Brazil.
Luiz Claudio Portnoi BaranDepartamento de Psicologia Experimental, Instituto de Psicologia, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Leonardo Dutra HenriquesDepartamento de Psicologia Experimental, Instituto de Psicologia, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Einat HauzmanDepartamento de Psicologia Experimental, Instituto de Psicologia, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Daniela Maria Oliveira BonciDepartamento de Psicologia Experimental, Instituto de Psicologia, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Marcelo Fernandes CostaDepartamento de Psicologia Experimental, Instituto de Psicologia, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Dora Fix VenturaDepartamento de Psicologia Experimental, Instituto de Psicologia, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Paulo Roney Kilpp GoulartNúcleo de Teoria e Pesquisa do Comportamento, Universidade Federal do Pará, Av. Generalissimo Deodoro 92, Umarizal, Belém, 66055-240, Brazil.
Givago Silva SouzaInstituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal do Pará, Belém, Brazil. givagosouza@ufpa.br.
Universidade Federal do Pará · BRUniversidade de São Paulo · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Color vision tests use estimative of threshold color discrimination or number of correct responses to evaluate performance in chromatic discrimination tasks. Both approaches have advantages and disadvantages. In the present investigation, we compared the number of errors during color discrimination task in normal trichromats and participants with color vision deficiency (CVD) using pseudoisochromatic stimuli at fixed saturation levels. We recruited 28 normal trichromats and eight participants with CVD. Cambridge Color Test was used to categorize their color vision phenotype, and those with a phenotype suggestive of color vision deficiency had their L- and M-opsin genes genotyped. Pseudoisochromatic stimuli were shown with target chromaticity in 20 vectors radiating from the background chromaticity and saturation of 0.06, 0.04, 0.03, 0.02, 0.01, and 0.005 u'v' units. Each stimulus condition appeared in four trials. The number of errors for each stimulus condition was considered an indicator of the participant's performance. At high chromatic saturation, there were fewer errors from both phenotypes. The errors of the normal trichromats had no systematic variation for high saturated stimuli, but below 0.02 u'v' units, there was a discrete prevalence of tritan errors. For participants with CVD, the errors happened mainly in red-green chromatic vectors. A three-way ANOVA showed that all factors (color vision phenotype, stimulus saturation, and chromatic vector) had statistically significant effects on the number of errors and that stimulus saturation was the most important main effect. ROC analysis indicated that the performance of the fixed saturation levels to identify CVD was better between 0.02 and 0.06 u'v' units reaching 100%, while saturation of 0.01 and 0.005 u'v' units decreased the accuracy of the screening of the test. We concluded that the color discrimination task using high saturated stimuli separated normal trichromats and participants with red-green color vision deficiencies with high performance, which can be considered a promising method for new color vision tests based in frequency of errors.

Indexed as

Color VisionColor Vision DefectsColor PerceptionHumansPhysical PhenomenaVision Tests

Identifiers

PMID35379850
PMCPMC8980068
OpenAlexW4226182190

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.