Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35379756›Full record

ArticleNeurology2022

Trends in Outpatient Treatment for Depression in Survivors of Stroke in the United States, 2004-2017.

Liming Dong, Briana Mezuk, Linda S Williams, Lynda D Lisabeth

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Liming DongFrom the Department of Epidemiology (L.D., B.M., L.D.L.), University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor; School of Population Medicine and Public Health (L.D.), Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China; Health Services Research and Development Center for Health Information and Communication (L.S.W.), Roudebush VA Medical Center; Department of Neurology (L.S.W.), Indiana University School of Medicine; and Regenstrief Institute, Inc. (L.S.W.), Indianapolis, IN. lmdong@umich.edu.
Briana MezukFrom the Department of Epidemiology (L.D., B.M., L.D.L.), University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor; School of Population Medicine and Public Health (L.D.), Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China; Health Services Research and Development Center for Health Information and Communication (L.S.W.), Roudebush VA Medical Center; Department of Neurology (L.S.W.), Indiana University School of Medicine; and Regenstrief Institute, Inc. (L.S.W.), Indianapolis, IN.
Linda S WilliamsFrom the Department of Epidemiology (L.D., B.M., L.D.L.), University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor; School of Population Medicine and Public Health (L.D.), Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China; Health Services Research and Development Center for Health Information and Communication (L.S.W.), Roudebush VA Medical Center; Department of Neurology (L.S.W.), Indiana University School of Medicine; and Regenstrief Institute, Inc. (L.S.W.), Indianapolis, IN.
Lynda D LisabethFrom the Department of Epidemiology (L.D., B.M., L.D.L.), University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor; School of Population Medicine and Public Health (L.D.), Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China; Health Services Research and Development Center for Health Information and Communication (L.S.W.), Roudebush VA Medical Center; Department of Neurology (L.S.W.), Indiana University School of Medicine; and Regenstrief Institute, Inc. (L.S.W.), Indianapolis, IN.
Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College · CN

Funding

Trends in mental health, use of mental health services and disparities among stroke survivors in the United States: 2004-2016R03NS111194 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI LISABETH, LYNDA D · 2020 to 2020
$156k
NINDS NIH HHS R03 NS111194
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivesDepression is highly prevalent and persistent among survivors of stroke. It is unknown how treatment for depression among survivors of stroke has changed in the evolving context of stroke care and mental health care in the general US population, especially among vulnerable sociodemographic subgroups who bear higher risks for stroke and unfavorable poststroke outcomes and experience disparities in access to and quality of stroke and mental health care. The study examined temporal trends in outpatient treatment for depression among survivors of stroke in the United States between 2004 and 2017.

methodsThe study sample consisted of 10,243 adult survivors of stroke and 264,645 adults without stroke drawn from the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey, a nationally representative survey in the United States. Trends in outpatient treatment for depression and potential unmet needs in the stroke population, including variations across sociodemographic subgroups, were examined and compared with the nonstroke population.

resultsThe rate of receipt of outpatient treatment for depression among survivors of stroke was 17.7% in 2004-2005 and 16.0% in 2016-2017 (adjusted odds ratio for period change [aOR] 0.90, 95% CI 0.71-1.15). Older, male, non-Hispanic Black, and Hispanic survivors of stroke were less likely to receive treatment for depression. Approximately two-thirds of survivors of stroke who screened positive for depression received no outpatient treatment during a calendar year. The sociodemographic disparities and treatment gap persisted during the study period, which differed from the nonstroke population. Among survivors of stroke who received any treatment for depression, there was a remarkable increase in use of psychotherapy (aOR 2.26, 95% CI 1.28-4.01), despite its less frequent use compared with pharmacotherapy. DISCUSSION: Although depression is common after stroke, the majority of survivors of stroke receive no treatment for depression. This gap has remained largely unchanged over past decades, with substantial sociodemographic differences. Efforts are needed to improve depression care for survivors of stroke and reduce disparities.

Indexed as

DepressionStrokeAdultAmbulatory CareHumansMaleOutpatientsSurvivorsUnited States

Identifiers

PMID35379756
PMCPMC9162167
OpenAlexW4226361670

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.